Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/25/2008 6:06:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl
Good old Arnold, he doesn't care what it cost people, take their land, tax them blind, who cares as long as the government gets their share and he can appease his wife.
2 posted on 04/25/2008 6:08:55 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

The Californians did this before. Instead of creating a law that simply says EM cannot be used for private purposes, the proposers of the new law tack on all sorts of other things in their peculiar interests.


4 posted on 04/25/2008 6:15:37 PM PDT by Shermy (These are the waffles we have been waiting for/ Lame Duck Legacy Obsessed American President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

EM?

I meant ED, eminent domain.

;)


6 posted on 04/25/2008 6:16:12 PM PDT by Shermy (These are the waffles we have been waiting for/ Lame Duck Legacy Obsessed American President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
Proposition 98 bans the use of eminent domain to transfer property to a private party,....It bans taking property for its natural resources.

This is a good thing.

How can a Republican Governor be against this...oh, wait, never mind.

7 posted on 04/25/2008 6:19:35 PM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
We need this law to prevent instances such as this.
8 posted on 04/25/2008 6:26:43 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

Eminent Domain should be a measure of last resort for public projects, not private. It should go for infrastructure stuff, period. Anything else is theft.


11 posted on 04/25/2008 6:30:42 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
Maybe he got his marching orders from the skirt:


12 posted on 04/25/2008 6:35:04 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

Well, Arnold, it’s nice to see that when developers and enviral nuts buy your support, it stays bought.


14 posted on 04/25/2008 6:37:32 PM PDT by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl; All

since it would only inhibit the abuse of eminent domain in the government forced transfer of land between private owners, is it arnold’s point that PRIVATE developers of “water” and other “infrastructure” projects should not have to use their own resources to coax out the sellers of the land they need????


16 posted on 04/25/2008 6:52:33 PM PDT by Wuli (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
Thank goodness! Where would California be with property rights? Or that what's the Governator wants the state's residents to believe.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

20 posted on 04/25/2008 7:28:18 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

Voting for arnold is the vote i regret most in my life. Hopefully McCain doesn’t trump it.


25 posted on 04/25/2008 8:29:53 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

Good thing we have a Republican for governor!


29 posted on 04/25/2008 9:05:56 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

America, don’t look now, but this is what a John McCain Presidency will look like.


32 posted on 04/25/2008 10:39:09 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl

I might have to vote YES on 98. The ads on radio are terrible.


33 posted on 04/26/2008 8:33:34 AM PDT by newzjunkey (This space under renovation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl; Grampa Dave; dalereed; tubebender; NormsRevenge; Carry_Okie; Anybody; Everybody
This is even more blatant than I would have expected. Two of the most conservative organizations supported him right from the start: The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and The California Farm Bureau Federation!

He's done nothing but crap on their collective heads with the Sierra-Nevada CONservancy and now even THIS!!! What have the good, solid people of CA done to deserve this treatment from this political hermaphrodite??? He's worse than Earl Warren and Hiram Johnson put together!!!

34 posted on 04/26/2008 11:23:49 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Out of the dung of adversity, spring the seeds of opportunity! America will always be exceptional!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson