Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

25 mothers taken from FLDS ranch now believed to be minors
Chron.com ^ | 4-24-08 | AP

Posted on 04/24/2008 3:01:56 PM PDT by Politicalmom

25 mothers taken from FLDS ranch now believed to be minors

SAN ANGELO, Texas — Twenty-five mothers staying at a shelter for children taken from a polygamists' compound are now believed to be minors.

Child Protective Services spokesman Darrell Azar says the girls initially claimed to be adults but are now believed to be under 18. The girls are in state custody.

The discovery takes the number of children taken from the ranch controlled by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints to 462. The number has been climbing since the state swept all the children off the ranch nearly three weeks ago.

Of the children taken into custody, roughly 260 remain at the San Angelo Coliseum. The others were bused to foster facilities around the state.ate.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: childabuse; flds; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-303 next last
To: Howdy there

They found SEVERAL “Sarah Jessops”.


181 posted on 04/25/2008 10:31:05 AM PDT by Politicalmom (The children were taken because they were either being raised to be raped, or raised to be a rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

“...25 underage moms...”

What is that? Is it illegal to be pregnant under a certain age? Is that what we’re coming to here? Do you imagine this is the only community where you would find young pregnant women?


182 posted on 04/25/2008 10:32:14 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there
You said:

Some of these children were born with one name and then taken from their fathers or even their mothers and reassigned to families living at the YFZ ranch.

They gave different names because of that.

___

Maybe Dale Barlow was one of them. If they can't keep their names straight how can Doran and the Texas Rangers?

183 posted on 04/25/2008 10:40:23 AM PDT by Pebcak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
What is that? Is it illegal to be pregnant under a certain age? Is that what we’re coming to here? Do you imagine this is the only community where you would find young pregnant women?

Your carefully intimated position (taken only in intimation to avoid any blowback from the absurdity of it) requires the willful suspension of my abilities to reason to buy in. As such, I will retain sanity and continue to point out that this cult is known for, and multiple members have been prosecuted and convicted for statutory rape. If you'd like, I can give you some names.

The presence of other underage moms in the world does not mean that we cannot protect young girls from being raped at the hands of their uncles, cousins, and in some cases, fathers. If you are unfamiliar with the history of the FLDS, there are a number of good books with which you can acquaint yourself. Under the Banner of Heaven, by Jon Krakauer, is a remarkably succint book detailing both the history and results of this cult. Though it was written around the time Warren Jeffs took control of the FLDS, Mr. Krakauer was remarkably prescient in noting what Jeff's effect would be on the cult. He even had information at the time that Warren was building a walled compound in a remote place to preserve the sect, long before even the locals of El Dorado knew what was going on there.

Either you can continue to shill for this case or you can acquaint yourself with some relevant facts about this cult. Your sophistry and misdirection (either out of naivete without any background information or with malicious obfuscation) is rather transparent.

184 posted on 04/25/2008 10:43:25 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

“The presence of other underage moms in the world does not mean that we cannot protect young girls from being raped at the hands of their uncles, cousins, and in some cases, fathers.”

Oh. So it IS a rape case. Then prosecute the criminal case. Prosecute the criminals.


185 posted on 04/25/2008 10:51:18 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

The mothers are minors in protective custody.

They were raped.

Pay attention.

Underage rape is a horror.
Underage rape that results in a pregnancy is heartbreaking.
Underage rape disguised as ‘marriage’ or other totally non-consentual nonsense is still a crime-— as is all of the above.

Again, the mothers are being protected from their rapists and those who assisted their rapists.

DNA evidence will identify their rapists.


186 posted on 04/25/2008 10:55:37 AM PDT by najida (On FR- Most guys see themselves is Brad Pitt, and think every woman here is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
Then prosecute the criminal case. Prosecute the criminals.

Do you think that the state suspects child abuse in a home, knows kids are in the home, and leaves the kids in that home while awaiting the gathering of evidence and a trial?

Children are removed on an all-too-regular basis from their homes because of ALLEGATIONS and EVIDENCE of abuse (not convictions). And the "all-too-regular" removals has a frightening correlation to "all-too-regular" abuse of children. If you think that we should not put out a fire until we prosecute the arsonist, you are free to hold that intellectually bankrupt position. I shall continue on in sanity.

187 posted on 04/25/2008 10:56:27 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

“...another 10 or 20 or 30 young girls are raped...”

This assumes rape has occurred. Okay. Prosecute the crime. Prosecute the criminals.


188 posted on 04/25/2008 10:57:24 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

This is a multi-case crime, involving underage rape as one of many crimes. The only way to identify the rapists is via DNA evidence from the in protective custody underage pregnant females. So yes, they are in the process of gathering evidence to prosecute the monsters who used these girls as sex slaves.

(Dang, if I didn’t know better, I’d swear Jeff’s had a lappy in his cell.)


189 posted on 04/25/2008 10:59:19 AM PDT by najida (On FR- Most guys see themselves is Brad Pitt, and think every woman here is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

No, I’m not sure. I don’t have to be. I don’t wield the collective power of the State.

Are you saying that NO child there was living with any biological parent? I doubt you believe that.


190 posted on 04/25/2008 11:00:18 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Have you read any sources about this particular sect outside of the news coverage of this event?


191 posted on 04/25/2008 11:02:32 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
Are you saying that NO child there was living with any biological parent? I doubt you believe that.

You responded to a poster saying that they were unsure of too many things. You cannot even be certain that all these kids were the biological kids of those who are parenting them. Do not throw stones about assumptions and probabilities when you have not the weight of all of them upon your side. Just a helpful suggestion. I know you'll appreciate it.

192 posted on 04/25/2008 11:04:21 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
This assumes rape has occurred.

You mean, this assumes that the normal activities of this cult continues. Yes.

193 posted on 04/25/2008 11:05:51 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Can you source that?


194 posted on 04/25/2008 11:09:14 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
no real teenage boy presence on the compound

I believe these girls are probably pregnant because of statutory rape by older males. But there were at least 2 dozen teens that we know of, males.

195 posted on 04/25/2008 11:10:33 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
You assume a lot here while not allowing others to assume that underage pregnant girls is proof of statutory rape.

The child had already been removed from the place she was sleeping by a CPs worker. So it is safe to assume she was frightened of them. WHo wouldn't be?

This 3 year old child is one that was taken without a mother. She had no one. I don't have a hard time believing she was scared. I have a 3 year old.

That having been said, I am good with any one assuming any thing they want to in the course of discussion.

196 posted on 04/25/2008 11:13:09 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Pebcak
Maybe Dale Barlow was one of them. If they can't keep their names straight how can Doran and the Texas Rangers?

Before the raid was executed, the sheriff spoke on the phone with Dale Barlow and KNEW that he was not present at this ranch, and had never even been there.

"Prior to executing the initial warrant, (Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran) was advised that Dale Barlow was in Arizona and not on the premises sought to be searched. In fact, prior to entering the premises Sheriff Doran actually spoke to Dale Barlow in Arizona by cellphone, confirming his driver license number and the fact that he was in Arizona," the filing says. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006954/posts

197 posted on 04/25/2008 11:15:27 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
You chose to devote your time and passion to the Jeffs team

Absolutely incorrect.

198 posted on 04/25/2008 11:16:27 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: najida
Toss in no teenage boys in puberty present

More than 2 dozen teen boys that are known.

199 posted on 04/25/2008 11:17:42 AM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

There is no defending this and those that do devalue religion and give the “religious right” a BAD NAME.


200 posted on 04/25/2008 11:18:33 AM PDT by Paco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson