Will Obama offer, that 'when HE is President; he will invite Kim Jung Il to the White House to solve this delemma?
Will Hillary promise - that if given the chance - that she will just obliterate all involved?
(1) it wasn't an active nuclear weapons program because there wasn't any plutonium fuel in the reactor yet at the time it was bombed (if there were, they'd scream about environmental risks instead)
(2) then they've said there is "no evidence" of *continuing* nuclear cooperation between North Korea and Syrian *since* the bombing (meaning, they want more leaks about which of their games have been noticed) and
(3) that nothing more is or was needed because the North Koreans *agreed* to halt cooperation with Syria or anybody else (of course, they agreed to that while they were still doing it, aka cheating), and then
(4) that disclosing any of it "might" make the North Koreas walk out of talks or otherwise "embarass" them (nothing about how embarassed the Dems are to be supporting these clowns). Meanwhile the Syrians have instead claimed
(5) that any video evidence the US shows must be fake, because after all the US attacked Iraq, so you have to be "gullible" to believe *the US* (and your lying eyes) in such things, instead of the trustworthy Syrians and North Koreans.
I swear I've made none of that up, that is their actual party line spin. The left is beyond parody, they are obscene.
Kim Jong Il: Now you see, the changing of the worrd is inevitabre!
Lisa: I'm sorry, it's what?
Kim Jong Il: Inevit, inevitabre.
Lisa: One more time.
Kim Jong Il: [shouts] INEVITABRE! Things are inevitabrey going to change! G*ddamnit, open your f*cking ears!
YES, they will whine about not being told.