Posted on 04/23/2008 10:25:32 PM PDT by neverdem
Thats nothing but pure BS. If you think everyone lives on animal feed corn, you are truely one of the fooled.
There is no food shortage.
Even in turd world countries, their food problems are political, not because the world can't produce enough.
Food price increases are NOT a result of bio fuels production.
Human grade food isn't even used in bio fuel production.
The cost of food is driven up by the price of oil, which effects production costs, transportation costs, labor costs, and delivery costs to the grocer. Fertilizer costs which have tripled for farmers this crop year, not to mention there being a severe shortage, as have machinery and other costs.
Good to see someone else besides me trying to correct the myth that bio fuel production is somehow causing food shortages.
It’s just incredible the amount of Bio fuel/ ethanol BS out there. Ethanol used to be the main fuel before oil came to be plentiful. Every farmer had it in their tractor, (and cupboard too)
Yup! In partnership with Cuba. Heck, I live in Florida and love our beaches, but the butt-headed pols say that oil rigs would spoil the view. And, a remote oil spill would spoil our beaches and scare tourist away. Well, duh, if the tourist can't afford gas they won't be coming to the beach anyway!
It is true that corn grown for ethanol production loses little of its feed value ..... if you are a cow.
If you are a human, more and more farm acreage is being diverted from producing crops, such as soybeans and wheat, that you can consume directly to producing a corn crop that only automobiles and cattle consume directly.
X number of bushels of grain can support Y number of people that consume it directly.
X number of bushels of grain fed to one steer can feed (Y-Z) number of people while Z number of people starve.
With a decrease in the supply of crops that you, as a human, can eat directly, the prices of those crops increases in accordance with the laws of supply and demand.
And where does that food not fit for human consupmptiuon come from to make ethanol?
Does it fall from the sky like manna?
No. It comes from growing it on limited farm acreage that would otherwise be used to grow food that IS fit for human consumption.
See Post 24.
The reason the Bible says that God sent manna floating down on the Israelites during their travels in the desert is precisely because of the fact that, in the desert, the Israelites were not growing any crops fit for human consumption.
There is no food shortage.
..... if you are a cow.
You’re not accounting for the shift in acreage. The biofuel subsidy program induced farmers to plant acreage that used to be planted in wheat to be planted in corn, because it made growing a low yield of non-food-quality corn more profitable than growing a moderate yield of wheat.
What do you think gasoline prices would do if you eliminated the additional refining capacity of the ethanol plants? Be careful what you wish for. We are not going to run out of food. We may run out of $2.50 wheat but we haven’t run out of $8.00 wheat. By the way anyone noticed the price of wheat lately? I assume bread has fallen in half also.
Can we be a little more obtuse? The reason ethanol increases the output of CO2 is that it leads directly to deforestation, whereas burning the stuff only releases the carbon that went into growing the ethanol in the first place.
Not that I care in the least for the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, I just mention it for the ironic value.
Thanks for the ping!
"It would make a lot more sense to drop the tariff, drop the subsidy, and allow Brazilian ethanol into the United States," said Philippe Reichstul, the chief executive of a biofuel company in Sao Paulo. "Pressure on U.S. land will be slashed."s/b
"It would make a lot more sense to drop the tariff, drop the subsidy, and allow Brazilian ethanol into the United States," said Philippe Reichstul, the chief executive of a biofuel company in Sao Paulo. "Pressure on my portfolio will be trashed."Why not buy ethanol from Brazil? Since we're unwilling to put any more petroleum production online due to concerns over ducks, polar bears, and caribou, it seems like a good time to take 40 to 50 per cent of agricultural acreage for corn and literally ship it overseas. What do we care where our food comes from? Hell, if Mexicans would grow corn for our market, they wouldn't be swarming across the border. Having another 2 per cent of the US population unemployed will be good for the economy, much better than tolerating some nakedly socialist scheme to insure a stable US food supply.
He's got a pretty good idea about what to do about healthcare reform. He makes a lot of sense when talking about tax reform. He's a reliable fiscal conservative on spending, as he voted against the prescription drug giveaway to geezers. I generally like his ideas about domestic policy.
There are only two things that make me really dislike the man: his position on immigration, and his propensity to support military interventions that have nothing to do with US interests. The man wanted us to send ground troops into Kosovo, for crying out loud! I'm very concerned that with him as commander in cheif, he'll be wasting money and lives by sending troops into places like Darfur.
But for these two issues, I could enthusiastically support his candidacy.
Great. Let's encourage even more destruction of the Amazon jungle.
another Amen from this hyar brother.
We do buy ethanol from Brazil. They are the largest supplier of imported ethanol into the US. 2/3 of the ethanol we do import comes from them.
U.S. Fuel Ethanol Imports by Country
http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/#F
The tariff is offset by the blender's subsidy making it about neutral for pricing of imported ethanol.
Note: I'm not in favor of the subsidy. I would like to see the tariff applied to all imported energy sources and more encouragement for domestic production of ALL energy sources, not just the ones with the best Congressional Lobby.
Thanks for that good info.
Tariff = subsidy. Seems that a lot of people who piss and moan about subsidies are still 100 per cent gung ho in favor of tariffs and blame subsidies (which aren’t globalist) and globalism (which is anti-subsidy and anti-tariff, and pro-laissez-faire) for economic ills.
The supposed annihilation of the Amazon rain forest is a load of greenie BS. But regardless, you may want to re-read my post.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2006150/posts?page=32#32
I agree, they are the same. I believe we have real economic and security reasons to encourage domestic production of energy. I favor them as long as they treat energy sources equally and let the market work out the most economic method of providing that energy. The government's job should be to get out of the way of that production regardless if it means oil platforms off California and Florida or Windmills in Ted Kennedy's view.
BioFuels Failing Bigtime in Germany
NPR | 04/23/2008 | Kyle James
Posted on 04/23/2008 4:47:55 PM PDT by raygunfan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2006029/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.