Nice to see them so twisted up. Who the hell cares about “popular” vote in a series of primaries??? It’s not a nat’l election. It’s a series of state contest. It would be like a second place team complaining that they scored more runs than the first place team. So what? It’s wins that matter.
Well,people did vote,is obama saying he would disenfranchise them?
Does Obama know how bad this makes him look?
Now he’s saying Michigan and Florida are just abstract numbers that aren’t a part of the real world. Naw, they can’t be real places with real people that want their votes to count.
He’s an idiot!
Bicker, bicker, bicker - from the article:
“I actually have more votes from people who actually voted for me,” Clinton added. “Last night’s win should give a lot of fresh information to our superdelegates, because after all, the road to Pennsylvania Avenue does lead through Pennsylvania.”
Not so witty.
It is consistant among Democrats that if they don’t win an election they claim voter fraud. It is truely refreshing to see them do this even among themselves.
Now that the two campaigns have enough money to spend, why don’t they re-consider the option of re-doing the MI and FL primaries again? Without tax-payer money, of course.
That does not include the 10 superdelgate margin HRC currently enjoys from those two states.
Considering the balance of the remaining states fit right in to HRC's demographic sweet spot, I suspect she will be ahead soon on that account.