To: Ultra Sonic 007
College student flunks: “Human” is an adjective.
16 posted on
04/23/2008 4:37:31 PM PDT by
Rudder
(Klinton-Kool-Aid FReepers prefer spectacle over victory.)
To: redpoll; Rudder
The lady who I quote in the beginning didn’t write do this project. o.o;
I did; I only used some of her points to argue against. The ‘Meat = Murder’ comments weren’t one of them. I just thought they were loony enough to point out to ya’ll.
Man, I hope no one’s getting the wrong impression about this. >>
18 posted on
04/23/2008 4:44:13 PM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: Rudder
College student flunks: Human is an adjective. 'Human' is being used to denote one's own inherent humanity, or exhibiting the innate quality one associates with humans. Used in the following manner:
Guy: That thing's not even HUMAN!
Except used here in my argument to denote the debate over whether or not the unborn should be considered human, and my website project delves deep into the subject. For the record, I think - KNOW - that the unborn are human.
33 posted on
04/23/2008 6:04:42 PM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: Rudder
Not according to Webster: Main Entry: human Function: noun Date: circa 1533 : a bipedal primate mammal (Homo sapiens: man; broadly : hominid hu·man·like Listen to the pronunciation of humanlike \-mən-ˌlīk\ adjective
41 posted on
04/23/2008 6:43:50 PM PDT by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson