Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patton

Oh, for heaven’s sake.

I can’t believe this has to be said repeatedly on the same thread.

The original search warrant named who/what was being searched for on the ranch property.

They saw evidence of statutory rape. They obtained a second warrant. (If you don’t understand, look up the term “In plain sight”.)

Based on the information and evidence recovered using that warrant, a judge signed a letter of removal, which isn’t even a necessary thing, from what I have read. They went OVER what they had to do.


43 posted on 04/22/2008 5:22:15 PM PDT by Politicalmom (The children were taken because they were either being raised to be raped, or raised to be a rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom

(ibidinum)

Which house was named in the original warrant?

What family?

What street address?

How did it expand to an entire town?

What specific charges were made against Joe Blow, the neighbor of the original family under suspiscion, that justified a warrant to search his house, and sieze his kids?

You can drive a military convoy through the legal holes in this.


46 posted on 04/22/2008 5:24:08 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson