Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: I'm ALL Right!
I saw it too. Dawkins did in fact say there must be some “higher being” involved in the origin of biological life on earth.

I think you're right that he used the term "higher being", but I am as certain as I can be that he was not advocating the necessity of such, but only allowing it into hypothetical consideration after being pressed by Stein.

I think he did say that anyone that was capable of doing this must be operating on a level far beyond humans, and I think this is what you are remembering. The "must" is applied as a stipulation in the hypothesis, and by no means refers to a belief that the hypothesis "must" be true.

65 posted on 04/21/2008 9:51:24 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew

The point was that he was incapable of explaining the origins of life and had to resort to “intelligent design” despite himself. It was a beautiful moment.


90 posted on 04/22/2008 5:56:38 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson