[tacticalogic]

Are you so dense as to consider "go hunting" as a valid test of anything? How about some parameters for the "test" and how those parameters validly indicate that something is an arrowhead while something else is not?

How about you stop digging before you get in any deeper. You've made a fool of yourself protesting a suggestion anyone else would have thought perfectly reasonable.

[AndrewC]

How about you stop digging before you get in any deeper. You've made a fool of yourself protesting a suggestion anyone else would have thought perfectly reasonable.

Speaking for others is an indication of megalomania. "Go hunting" is not a rational test for "arrowheadness" without specifying relevant parameters and indicating their relevance.