Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Were they frightened or not?

That's what was reported.

Here we disagree again.

Compromise means compromise. It doesn't mean you get it all your way or take your toys home in a hissy fit.

Where does the statement, not made by Dembski, state that they want no association with DI?

It's in the article.

You might be confusing the internet connection with association.

Imagine an exchange like this from Obama:

"The Communist Party of America links to your site and endorses you."

O: "Well, I can't control who links to my site."

"But you were a paid employee of the CPA for the three years prior to your running, and they hosted a recent fundraiser for you."

That's what this sounds like. You must really want for there to be a campaign of persecution. Hint: Yes, the protected groups in this country get over by playing their respective cards, and it would be tempting to want that for yourself. But watch out, it's a dishonest liberal trap. Start climbing before you fall all the way in and become one of them.

626 posted on 04/30/2008 10:18:49 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
That's what was reported.

From a single individual, unless you can show more.

Compromise means compromise. It doesn't mean you get it all your way or take your toys home in a hissy fit.

True, but when you are not involved in the compromise process, you don't have to accept the resulting compromise unless you agreed to accept any outcome. Then, to maintain integrity, you would have to bend over and take it when the "compromise" was fecally endowed.

It's in the article.

The word is in the article, but not used by Dembski or his co-worker. Search the article for yourself.

So, Obama was a paid employee of the CPA. That is relevant. In the instance we are discussing "Creationism Connection" was also mentioned as a "such as". What is Dembski's previous association with them? I told you that the Center's association with the Discovery Institute was open knowledge. It was a sponsor of the conference held there. I did not say that there was no association. I said the comment about links was a valid answer without denying association. It denied giving permission for connection in relation to the internet.

639 posted on 04/30/2008 11:40:58 AM PDT by AndrewC (You should go see "Expelled")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson