Replies

I think ID skates close, sometimes crossing into the same error. Where it doesn’t it provides some interesting possible avenues, science to science. This is the debate I’d like to see.

But both sides would need in both science and philosophy to conduct it.
So far I haven’t seen it, though I’m not completely informed on all of ID, just the basics. As I said before Dawkins is immensely ill-equipped for it. I hope someone else comes along, it could be very elevating for the field and for the culture.

59 posted on 04/21/2008 9:41:36 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)

But both sides would need in both science and philosophy to conduct it. So far I haven’t seen it, though I’m not completely informed on all of ID, just the basics. As I said before Dawkins is immensely ill-equipped for it. I hope someone else comes along, it could be very elevating for the field and for the culture.

Excellent post.

178 posted on 04/22/2008 5:53:47 PM PDT by jmc813 (Eek!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794