You've apparently provided a completely different kind of sample than the specimen for comparison, in hopes of producing a false conclusion that you could use to discredit the process.
This is hypothetical. You were given the opportunity to provide the tests and the specifications. My only limitations were the things that I observed. I saw a shaped rock that I thought was an arrowhead. You were to provide tests that would allow us to test the validity of my hypothesis. I think I have shown that the hypothesis comes before the tests. You have to see the thing and hypothesize things before you specify the tests. I do not think that functional tests would determine anything since my hypothesis did not include a functional requirement. If you don't like my functional test, then go and specify your own. I did not stop you from doing that. So don't accuse me of things you dream up due to your lack of participation. Answer my blood question, if you want to show that you are interested in discussion rather than "name-calling".