To: AndrewC
Nice words, but it is a rock. Functionality is not a valid test. That's a stupid statement. If it's supposed to be an arrowhead, and it's design is incompatible with fulfilling that function, then where is the "intelligence" of the design?
501 posted on
04/29/2008 5:39:06 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Apparently some folks can’t get their minds around the concept of multiple independent lines of evidence.
502 posted on
04/29/2008 5:41:55 AM PDT by
js1138
To: tacticalogic
If it's supposed to be an arrowhead, and it's design is incompatible with fulfilling that function, then where is the "intelligence" of the design? What? the damn rock/arrowhead is a paper weight. Oh did I forget to tell you, the point on the rock/arrowhead makes the rock/arrowhead an awl. Get the hint. Functionality is in the eye of the beholder. I have demonstrated that functionality is not a valid test.
505 posted on
04/29/2008 6:24:14 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(You should go see "Expelled")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson