Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Step 2 does not follow from step 1 since you relate ID to religion then equate ID to religion without proof. The Declaration of Independance is based upon religion, but I know of noone who equates the Declaration to a religion.

Your third step equates ID with Christians by implication yet the record clearly shows that Muslims believe in ID and further, it is often pointed out by Darwinists that Christians believe in Darwinism. Therefore it is erroneous to exclusively equate ID and Christians.

Step 4 therefore does not follow.

Fallacies do not have length as a requirement. They are simply fallacies.

463 posted on 04/28/2008 2:23:51 PM PDT by AndrewC (You should go see "Expelled")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
Step 2 does not follow from step 1 since you relate ID to religion then equate ID to religion without proof.

The Wedge Document. It states all the way through a clear religious purpose.

Your third step equates ID with Christians by implication yet the record clearly shows that Muslims believe in ID

Muslims aren't trying to get ID in schools as science.

t is often pointed out by Darwinists that Christians believe in Darwinism.

Most Christians are able to separate their personal religious belief from science. Others apparently think their belief should take the place of science.

Therefore it is erroneous to exclusively equate ID and Christians.

It has been clearly equated by the founders and leaders of the ID movement in this country. The Wedge Document even specifically talks about preaching to the choir (Christians) as an easy way to gain momentum for ID.

482 posted on 04/28/2008 6:22:56 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson