For someone who feels no obligation to answer my point, you certainly have been posting to me a lot. Did you think you could divert attention from my suggestion by changing the subject?
But if you aren’t inclined to answer, I will address my query to lurkers.
Ben Stein, in his Newsweek interview, said that people had been fired for supporting ID, and that many people refused to be interviewed for fear of having their careers ruined.
And yet hundreds of PhD level people have signed the Discovery Institute statement which questions the adequacy of mainstream evolution. Wouldn’t it be reasonable to look at this rather large sample of ID supporters, and see if they have been fired in unusual numbers? Or had scientific papers rejected simply because of their beliefs?
I stated I had no obligation to argue your point. I am somewhat obligated to answer a question posed to me. Which I have done. If your complaint is my posting to you a lot, then stop asking me questions. That is a fairly simple thing to do.
Did you think you could divert attention from my suggestion by changing the subject?
No, since telling you to answer your own question is not changing the subject.
And I would hope the audience to which you are playing would give you what I consider the right answer, "Find out yourself".