You don’t think it it reasonable to discriminate against a person who undermines the goals and objectives of his employer? Or one whose goals are antithetical to the goals of the employer?
That situation would be covered by the "discrimation necessary to achieve stated goals" if they were stated. Were they? If not, I think that is close to unethical or immoral. A simple test to ascertain if the goals were stated would be for you to list those goals and objectives. If they are not stated, well then your statement is entirely hypothetical and deserves no answer.