Where have I said this? I have no inside knowledge of these cases, and I will thank you in advance for not putting words in my mouth.
By implication. If knowing that in each case, except maybe Gonzalez, the institutions do not admit to preventing an individual from teaching or being associated with something that they did not like, then you state the following" How is it unfair to prevent someone from teaching something the university does not want taught?; it is reasonable to draw the implication that the universities were lying about said motivator. So show me in every case that we are discussing that the institutions admit to preventing them from etc.
You're welcome. But I did not do that, I asked a question indicating that I drew an inference. Since you have no inside knowledge of these cases, your questions are entirely hypothetical and are red herring so you have no reason to apply any answer given to the situations under discussion. I have public comments and emails to back up my conclusions.