[tacticalogic]

I did not say that you had to use the word, so I assume you mean that allowing the use of the word "ID" would lead to a fixation by the users of the word. I don't believe that is a justified conclusion. But I do understand your concern. Dawkins comes to mind.

If you're trying to make the argument that there are evolution zealots, but there's simply no such thing as an ID zealot I'm calling BS.

[AndrewC]

If you're trying to make the argument that there are evolution zealots, but there's simply no such thing as an ID zealot I'm calling BS.

And you would be absolutely correct. But I'm not saying that. I'm saying Dawkins has a fixation. But that in no way leads to the conclusion that Darwinism should ever be unmentionable.