Posted on 04/21/2008 12:20:55 PM PDT by mdittmar
It remains to be seen whether the Democrats will ultimately take their fight for a presidential candidate all the way to the Democratic National Convention this August in Denver, but for many activists tired of the two-party system and the ongoing war, they will be demonstrating at the convention regardless of who the final nominee is. We speak with Mark Cohen, an organizer with Recreate ’68, and Mark Silverstein, the legal director of the ACLU in Colorado. [includes rush transcript]
AMY GOODMAN: We’re broadcasting from Denver, Colorado, from the PBS station KBDI, where Democracy Now! broadcasts here in Denver. Yes, Denver will play host to the Democratic National Convention this August, and preparations are well under way for the big event. It remains to be seen whether the Democrats will ultimately take their fight for a presidential candidate all the way to the convention. But for many activists tired of the two-party system and the ongoing war, they will be demonstrating at the convention, regardless of who the final nominee is.
As Denver readies to sign contracts with dozens of security agencies ahead of the convention, we look at some of the concerns around the rights of the protesters and how lawyers and activists are preparing to protect demonstrators.
Mark Silverstein is on the phone with us, legal director of the ACLU in Colorado. We’re also joined in the studio at KBDI by Mark Cohen. He is an organizer with Recreate ’68, a group of activists attempting to greet this year’s Democratic National Convention with the same demands of accountability and ending the war that animated protesters in Chicago forty years ago.
We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Mark Cohen, what are your plans for this convention?
MARK COHEN: Thank you, Amy. We plan to have a massive presence during the Democratic National Convention in August. We will be having a number of major demonstrations, including on the Sunday, the day before the convention begins, what will probably be the biggest antiwar march and rally that Denver has seen at least since Vietnam. We’re also working with some of the major immigrant rights groups to, on the Tuesday, have what we think will be a very large immigrant rights march and rally.
But we’re not only involved in protest activities. We’re also staging what we’re calling the Festival of Democracy, which will be a five-day event in downtown Denver, during which we will have trainings, workshops, teach-ins, and provide people the opportunity to come together and learn about alternatives to the two-party system, solutions that communities can provide to their own problems. We’re also, during that, going to have a 24/7 free health clinic, legal services, two feedings a day in cooperation with Food Not Bombs and other services for the community.
AMY GOODMAN: And who is “we”?
MARK COHEN: We are Recreate ’68, which is a group of local Denver activists. We began planning for the Democratic National Convention actually before we found out that Denver had been given the convention. It looked like a fairly certain thing. So we’ve been planning for about a year and a half now. We’ve been talking with the city to try to ensure that people’s First Amendment rights would be protected during the convention. We’ve been working with national organizations, among them United for Peace and Justice, CODEPINK and others, as well as numerous Colorado organizations, to prepare for this event, to try to use the attention and the excitement and the energy generated by this major event to kind of kick organizing in Denver up to another level.
AMY GOODMAN: Mark Silverstein, you’re legal director of the Colorado ACLU. What are the city’s plans for these protests?
MARK SILVERSTEIN: Well, you’re asking me to tell you the city’s plans, and unfortunately the city has not responded to some of our requests for information about those plans. I can tell you that political conventions like this have historically been marked by struggles over law enforcement’s attempt to balance interest in security with the First Amendment rights of the public and protesters. And in the past, that balance has sometimes been subjected to judicial review, and courts have disagreed with law enforcement about the proper balance.
And since 9/11, I think the issues have even gotten more intense. We know in Boston in 2004, the city provided what it called a “demonstration zone” outside of the convention that the district court said was like a concentration camp and an affront to the First Amendment. But there wasn’t enough time for the court to fully evaluate it and issue an order that would remedy the problems.
We have been trying to find out what it will look like, what kind of regulations will apply to First Amendment activity near the site of the convention. And so far, Denver has been either unwilling or unable to discuss any of that in detail, pointing to the Secret Service as the ultimate shot caller for security at the convention. And the Secret Service has said, well, it won’t have details to reveal to the public until sometime this summer, maybe as late as August. And, of course, that might be far too late to have any negotiation over the arrangements for First Amendment activity and certainly too late for an opportunity for judicial review. So that’s very much a concern for us.
AMY GOODMAN: I’m looking at a piece just recently in the Denver Post, “No Cages for DNC Protesters,” that according to Denver City Councilman Charlie Brown, protesters will not be confined to cages during the Democratic National Convention. The city wants to get away from the long lines of shoulder-to-shoulder, riot gear-clad police that typified security, saying, “We don’t want to provoke violence.” Mark?
MARK SILVERSTEIN: And that’s a very commendable sentiment. And, you know, at the ACLU, we certainly hope that what Councilman Brown says will indeed be the reality. But, you know, there’s a question that I always ask when somebody in government makes an assurance like that. I ask, “Well, how do they know?” because when we’ve talked with the city officials or when we’ve read what’s quoted in the newspaper, the answer always is, “Well, we don’t know yet, because the Secret Service ultimately makes the decision, and the Secret Service isn’t saying, at least publicly.”
So there’s a rumor that there’s going to be a one-mile radius hard security perimeter around the convention site. And then you can occasionally read in the paper, somebody will debunk that as a rumor. It’s not true that there will be one-mile security zone around the convention, but yet, when you talk to the city people who ought to know, they say, “Well, we don’t know yet.” And if they don’t know, then how do they know there won’t be a one-mile security radius? There must be some plans already formulated.
AMY GOODMAN: Keeping protesters one mile away from the Pepsi Center? That’s where the Democratic Convention is going to be?
MARK SILVERSTEIN: That’s correct. That’s correct.
AMY GOODMAN: According to Colorado Confidential, a web publication, the Denver Police Department is using taxpayer money to buy new security equipment in preparation for the DNC but is refusing to disclose exactly what the purchases are, saying that revealing the information would be contrary to the public interest. Mark Cohen, what do you know about that?
MARK COHEN: We do know that the city council has allocated $5 million for new weapons for the Denver Police Department. We know that in St. Paul, they have issued tasers to every single officer on the force. We’re aware that there are new weapons out there that are being ostensibly used for crowd control in places like Iraq. But we’ve seen a report on 60 Minutes, for example, where they were doing field tests with these weapons, and the people they were testing on were dressed as protesters and carrying protest-type signs. So we have a feeling that the field tests for these new weapons are going to be at the Democratic National Convention and possibly the Republican Convention, as well. So, the weapons that are being designed primarily for military use are going to be used on peaceful, nonviolent protesters.
AMY GOODMAN: One of the things that we’ve seen at the conventions past is the level of infiltration by police and also surveillance. Now, Mark Cohen, you were a plaintiff in the Denver spy files case.
MARK COHEN: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain what that was.
MARK COHEN: We discovered in—I believe it was 2001, that the—or maybe earlier than that, but we discovered that the Denver Police Department had been keeping what they called “criminal intelligence files” on people who had engaged in no criminal activity but simply exercised their First Amendment rights in protests and demonstrations. There were labels on these files, such as “criminal extremist.” And the information in these files was, first of all, not the kind of information that had any relationship to criminal activity. They had–people had written letters to the editors of local papers, and they had stuck these in files. And they also had a good deal of false information.
My wife, who is a middle-aged Jewish woman, was identified as belonging to a white racist motorcycle gang that dealt in drugs and weapons. So, we’re obviously very concerned about this, especially because we discovered that these files were being shared with other law enforcement agencies. And in the atmosphere after 9/11, this is a very dangerous thing to be identified as a criminal extremist and as, presumably, a security threat. So we did sue the city and got out of the suit a change in policy, which prevents the Denver Police Department from collecting intelligence information on people who are not actually engaged in criminal activity.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, we are going to leave it there for now but certainly will continue to follow this. Mark Cohen with us from Recreate ’68 and Mark Silverstein on the line with us, legal director of the Colorado ACLU, I want to thank you both for being with us.
MARK COHEN: Thank you.
Just like these idiots to want to recreate one of the worst years of the 20th century.
Amazing-they are going to hand McCain the Presidency. What a shame Thompson isn't the recipient of the Democratic Civil War.
The activists who are tired of the two-party system are Communists. The same Communists who led the so called anti-war movement (the same Communists who support Palestinian terrorists in their war).
And while it may be illegal for foreigners to vote in our election, it is legal for foreigners to protest in America. If another WTO type riot breaks out, that is among the contingent plans. They should be denied entry into the country. They are agitators. And Communists.
They are fighting over which Democrat is the better Marxist to lead the U.S.S.A..
They do realize that the favorite to win the Democratic nomination got shot right?
Ah, but the revenue potential for the latest protest song is staggering. Will CSN&Y have a benefit concert? Will there be a Woodstock concert?...
There will be no pictures of you and Willie May
pushing that shopping cart down the block on the dead run,
or trying to slide that color television into a stolen ambulance.
NBC will not be able predict the winner at 8:32
or report from 29 districts.
The revolution will not be televised.
“MARK COHEN: We do know that the city council has allocated $5 million for new weapons for the Denver Police Department. We know that in St. Paul, they have issued tasers to every single officer on the force. We’re aware that there are new weapons out there that are being ostensibly used for crowd control in places like Iraq. But we’ve seen a report on 60 Minutes, for example, where they were doing field tests with these weapons, and the people they were testing on were dressed as protesters and carrying protest-type signs. So we have a feeling that the field tests for these new weapons are going to be at the Democratic National Convention and possibly the Republican Convention, as well. So, the weapons that are being designed primarily for military use are going to be used on peaceful, nonviolent protesters.”
giggle.
Really? It remains to be seen? You will never see Hillary quit. Never. Ever. Anything less than her winning will result in total annihilation of the Democrat party at her hand by dragging it all the way to the convention in Denver.
Which is funny, if you think about it.
It should be legal to hunt and trap ACLU plague rats.
I'm sure the Democrats will be in substantial disarray for some time to come.
And equally sure that McCain and the Republicans will also run a somewhat inept campaign, and miss many opportunities to make the case for conservatism.
So it's a race to see who stumbles the least, and turns off the fewest voters, before Election Day.
Whichever candidate speaks the LEAST will win.
Please excuse the extreme cynicism. It's been a long day.
I've been thinking about this. Here is a scenario that could play itself out. Hillary makes a deal with Obama and the DNC .. they agree to pay off her $20 million (plus) campaign debt .. make Bill a Diplomat .. support her strongly in the next NY Senate race .. and she will go away .. and start saying nice things about Obama.
By now, she knows she isn't going to be the next President. We know what she is .. so it's just a question of "how much?". When it comes to corruption, the Russian mafia has nothing on her. She can be bought and will go away for the right price.
That sounds good, except for one part. Hillary wants to be President, not Senator, and not a diplomat’s wife. She has been the First Lady of the United States and that wasn’t enough. She’s been a governor’s wife. She’s been lots of things, and she is sure she is supposed to be President.
I have read it written more than once by people who have known them that the Clintons have stayed together because they have a deal. First it was his turn, then it would be hers.
She’s put up with his cheating and rubbing it in her face, she’s been shamed (to the degree that that is possible) and she has been made fun of.
I’m not sure she can be bought because she has tons of money. How much more does anyone need when they are millionaires 100 times over?
You can see it in everything she does. If she had been so inclined, she could have been Veep on the ticket, but she doesn’t want to be Veep.
It’s been “all or nothing” with her run and she is leaving a scorched earth in her wake.
It has an air of Greek Tragedy surrounding it. Fascinating with a touch of schadenfreude.
Because their allies aren't radical enough for them.
It remains to be seen if the protesters will be peaceful and non-violent. Authorities should prepare for the worst. With these guys saying they want to “Re-create ‘68”, isn’t that a clear warning to expect that violence could happen??????
"Like the Democratic Party itself, the Mile High City embodies the 21st century ideals of economic strength, environmental consciousness, regional collaboration, cutting-edge technological infrastructure and visionary zeal that will help lead America in the year 2008 and beyond."
-- John Hickenlooper, Mayor of Denver
Hillary wants to be President, not Senator, and not a diplomat’s wife.
You got It!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.