[freespirited]

WND is a good conservative site often quoted by Rush. What have you learned that indicates anything else?

WND doesn't have as good a record for accuracy as it should. This mistake is a classic example ... construing the endorsement for the primary as an endorsement for the presidential race.

[donna]

construing the endorsement for the primary as an endorsement for the presidential race.

That's not a mistake, it's a conservative point of view.

WND is one place to get info conservatives will never get otherwise.

It's a dirty shame to bad-mouth the site.