Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: purpleraine
I am far from an expert on this topic, but what’s wrong with building a couple of bypasses around several cities and widening I-35 or I-29?

Nothing, as far as I know. And some of that could probably be tax-financed if some of the state gasoline tax wasn't being diverted to public skrools, DPS, and other things.

I-35 is being widened to six lanes south of DFW, but widening it beyond that would be a really expensive proposition, since TxDOT would have to purchase expensive (and presumably developed) land along the highway. And don't you mean I-27?

25 posted on 04/20/2008 2:48:46 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I meant I-29 KC through the Dakotas to Winnepeg.


32 posted on 04/20/2008 7:36:55 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
“I-35 is being widened to six lanes south of DFW, but widening it beyond that would be a really expensive proposition, since TxDOT would have to purchase expensive (and presumably developed) land along the highway.”

As a matter of fact, they're widening/improving all the Interstates to and from the Dallas/Ft. Worth area.

As far as I-35E, south of Dallas, if you've ever driven that stretch, there's not a lot of development.

Would it cost billions to add additional lanes? No!

If necessary, the additional lanes could be tolled not, by a foreign company but, by the state.

39 posted on 04/21/2008 4:26:15 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson