Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libertarian444

Mike Warner was a better candidate on their side. Don’t know why he did not run.


24 posted on 04/20/2008 12:02:57 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: indianrightwinger

There were many better candidates, but the press shut out everyone but B. Hussein and Hillary because, after all, wouldn’t it be great to have a woman or black as their candidate. Mediots will live to regret their tampering with the electoral process.

I’d like to see them regulated or at least sued by those who carefully count up the hours of media time and positive/negative slant they give each candidate. The press doesn’t answer to anyone — and apparently they should, as they’ve become nothing but a PR firm.


26 posted on 04/20/2008 12:13:53 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: All

The two terms we must never let liberals utter without getting a face full of claws are

McCarthyism

and “Swift Boated”


27 posted on 04/20/2008 12:16:57 PM PDT by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger
Mike Warner was a better candidate on their side. Don’t know why he did not run.

The thought of Hitlery's Opposition Research rootin' through their lives, garbage and whatnot stopped all but the truly narcicistic from getting in this race.

30 posted on 04/20/2008 12:32:06 PM PDT by woofer (Earth First! We'll mine the other eight later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson