Skip to comments.
Democrats' Damaging Brawl - Clinton and Obama are paving the way to a McCain win.
The Washington Post ^
| April 20, 2008
| David S. Broder
Posted on 04/19/2008 10:23:27 PM PDT by Aristotelian
As a rule, presidential elections are not won or lost by what happens in April. But last week, more and more Democratic officeholders and strategists were worrying out loud about the possibility that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are running themselves into trouble with their unending battle for the nomination.
The negativity of the campaigning for Tuesday's Pennsylvania primary is spotlighting issues that can easily be exploited in the general election by Republican John McCain. And the increasingly personal tone of the Clinton-Obama exchanges is draining some of the enthusiasm from Democrats, who have believed for many months that 2008 would be their year for victory.
Even so, according to this month's Post-ABC News poll, there is still no strong demand from grass-roots Democrats for the two senators to end their battle and turn to the challenge posed by McCain.
By a margin of 53 percent to 41 percent, those surveyed said that it is more important that their favorite candidate win, even if the race goes into the summer, than that the race end as soon as possible.
Supporting that finding, by an identical margin, these Democrats said that Clinton should remain in the race even if she suffers an upset loss in Pennsylvania on Tuesday.
By contrast, in conversations Wednesday and Thursday with members of Congress and other Democratic officials, I found few superdelegates who are sanguine about the prospect of seeing the intraparty fight continue until the late-August convention in Denver.
They were reacting in part to Wednesday night's savage ABC News debate, perhaps the nastiest since Clinton and Obama sparred in South Carolina more than two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; demprimary; hillary; obama; pa2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Clinton and Obama are paving the way to a McCain win. That should make much of a difference to liberals. Any way you cut it, they'd have one of their own in the Oval Office.
To: Aristotelian
Correction: That shouldn’t make ...
2
posted on
04/19/2008 10:27:35 PM PDT
by
Aristotelian
("Sock it to me!" Judy Carne)
To: Aristotelian
As a rule, presidential elections are not won or lost by what happens in April.
I'd say the 1992 election was lost largely because of the Rodney King incident. It was the videotape of the beating that undid papa Bush's mojo from Desert Storm. The riots were in April 1992.
3
posted on
04/19/2008 10:27:36 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: Question Liberal Authority
I'd say the 1992 election was lost largely because of the Rodney King incident.What about Perot?
To: Aristotelian
By a margin of 53 percent to 41 percent, those surveyed said that it is more important that their favorite candidate win
In other words, avoiding conflict is meaningless if it comes at the expense of victory.
That is the exact opposite of Obama's message.
5
posted on
04/19/2008 10:34:08 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: Question Liberal Authority
so rodney king was
BUSH'S FAULT v.1.0!
6
posted on
04/19/2008 10:34:22 PM PDT
by
Liberty2007
(Wayne Allyn Root Rootforamerica.com LP candidate)
To: TheWasteLand
What about Perot?
You're right. He declared in February.
Maybe these pre-Labor Day events are more important than folks want to think.
7
posted on
04/19/2008 10:36:04 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: Aristotelian
Nominating a black man is a watershed moment for the dems, but so is nominating a woman........... so waht do the dems do? They try both duering the same election and tear themselves apart.
8
posted on
04/19/2008 10:40:04 PM PDT
by
umgud
To: umgud
9
posted on
04/19/2008 10:42:26 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(Hey GOP...NO money till border closed and criminal illegals deported)
To: spokeshave
And pass the Shardenfreude
10
posted on
04/19/2008 10:43:05 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(Hey GOP...NO money till border closed and criminal illegals deported)
To: Liberty2007
so rodney king was BUSH'S FAULT v.1.0!
Depends on how you define it. Don't forget some of these clowns blame papa Bush for the assassination of JFK, and grandpa Bush for the rise of Hitler.
Plus, there was the October Surprise, where, as a private citizen, Bush commandeered a US military jet and held a secret meeting with Islamic radicals, conspiring to undermine the otherwise wildly popular president, Jimmy Carter.
Then there was the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein, which, of course, was the fault of George W. Bush because some low level diplomat supposedly gave Saddam the green light.
And when Saddam lit the oil wells on fire, the environmental experts said that it would cause a nuclear winter, possibly exterminating all life on Earth.
11
posted on
04/19/2008 10:44:28 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: Aristotelian
They were reacting in part to Wednesday night's savage ABC News debate
What I wouldn't give if there was an actual savage debate between those two - hosted by Michael Savage.
12
posted on
04/19/2008 10:46:35 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: umgud
but is Hillary a real woman candidate? She’s so mannish and is an extension of Bill Clinton, running as if she were co-president during those eight years..............
To: Aristotelian
Here’s to McCain coasting to victory.
14
posted on
04/19/2008 10:50:44 PM PDT
by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: spokeshave
15
posted on
04/19/2008 10:58:06 PM PDT
by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Shes so mannish ...I dispute this. I assume you refer to her combativeness, dominance, etc. as mannish, but her appearance, with her extreme hippiness and narrow shoulders, create a distinctly womanish impression, and her pesonality is accommodated by several traditional female stereotypes, such as the "battle ax" and the "dominatrix".
16
posted on
04/19/2008 11:07:04 PM PDT
by
dr_lew
To: Aristotelian
This fight is an example to the truest liberal principles: “self before party, party before country”.
17
posted on
04/19/2008 11:07:55 PM PDT
by
NurdlyPeon
(New tag line in progress.)
To: Aristotelian
I’m not so sure about. After they fight it out and a winner declared, I think they will turn their attention toward him.
To: dr_lew
19
posted on
04/19/2008 11:18:19 PM PDT
by
OeOeO
To: Aristotelian
Political ambition of Clinton and arrogance of Obama might be destroying the liberals’ wet dreams come November.
20
posted on
04/19/2008 11:18:50 PM PDT
by
sagar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson