[Eccl 10:2]

Here are the two clips from two venues - it was no accident:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D83Cfesd2Ow&feature=related

Someone oughta archive these before YouTube yanks em.

[cricket]

Thanks; great in 'slow motion'. . .and having mentioned Obama's talent in the 'art of hand language' ; please note the hand/arm thrust when he speaks of Hillary; following the 'finger message'. i.e. just before, he offers she was taking every opportunity to. . .get a dig in there.

And yes, the two women in the back 'get it'.

More incredible in slow motion. . .

Names mean things and this jerk IS an 'obamanation'.

[pinkyandthebrain]

I was hoping you were right about it being two speeches, because I strongly doubt his jesture was an accident, and it woudl be nice to have proof. However, it is very clear that the two links show the same speech from two different angles. Compare the stammerings and jestures. Persons behind him are different only because of the camera angle.

[vietvet67]

Love the slo-mo audio on the first clip.

Sounds like Obama’s drunk as a skunk..

[tioga]

Same speech, two different locations, same finger goes up....both times the audience clearly understands what he did. What a little low life creep. Disgusting, really. Hardly presidential.

[cricket]

Did not even look at the second! Incredible; surely speaks to his 'defenders' i.e. 'fool me once. . ./fool me twice'.

Actually, am wondering if anyone has taken time to look back at past footage; don't know the context; but am sure I have seen that finger message in 'speeches' past.

Now, will Brit 'go here' with two video's confirming that this scratch is not at all, in any way. . .defensible or innocent?