Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani breaks rules by having Communion at papal mass
Reuters ^ | 19 Apr 2008 | Claudia Parsons

Posted on 04/19/2008 12:30:24 PM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: don-o

what’s a noob?


41 posted on 04/19/2008 1:48:27 PM PDT by stravinskyrules (Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules

newbie
new user


42 posted on 04/19/2008 1:50:41 PM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben, reports to Parris Island on June 30.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: penowa

No church should deny ANYONE communion. That is between each of us sinners and God. Who are they to judge us on our morals and our inner relationship with our Lord.


43 posted on 04/19/2008 1:52:22 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bratch; BGHater

John 8:1-11 is a spurious text.
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=1316


44 posted on 04/19/2008 1:57:17 PM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66

According the the rules of the Church, one may not receive Holy Communion if one has a mortal sin on their soul that they have not gone to Confession to have absolved by a priest. One may receive Communion with a venial (less serious) sin on one’s soul, but you first have to make a good Act of Contrition. The Church does not say that only perfect people who have never committed a sin can receive Holy Communion. But one cannot receive the sacrament while still in the act of committing the sin, or for not having had proper absolution for that sin. If you are a divorced Catholic still currently married to a second or third spouse without benefit of having the marriage blessed in the Church, then you are currently living in sin, and cannot receive Communion in the state of grace. We must show that we are truly remorseful for our sins, and that cannot be achieved while still living in sin.


45 posted on 04/19/2008 1:58:32 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: penowa

Any Catholic that gives enough money to the church can do just about what they want. Ask Ted Kennedy the resident swimmer of the senate.


46 posted on 04/19/2008 2:07:15 PM PDT by chainsaw ( No black racist Muslims in the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk; penowa

“No church should deny ANYONE communion. That is between each of us sinners and God. Who are they to judge us on our morals and our inner relationship with our Lord.”

1 Corinthians 5:9-13
9 I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person. 12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”

Churches which ignore the behavior of “notorious” sinners (those who carry on publicly, and show no evidence of repentance) are doing those individuals a disservice by failing to confront them, in love, and deny them access to the communion table. Both they, and the individuals whose willful blindness they facilitate, are in serious danger.

The same chapter (7) in Matthew which begins in this way:

1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.”

goes on in this vein:

13 “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14 Because[a] narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.

15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’


47 posted on 04/19/2008 2:08:49 PM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
I repeat, no church should deny anyone the right to communion. In those days all the church members knew each other and their personal life. Now days, the pastor or priest knows very little about his flock. So when communion is offered, who is he to deny anyone he does not even know. It is true that the Word of God does not change but circumstances change continually. Not only that but say a drunkard rapist robber later turned to the Lord but the pastor is not aware of his change. It would be wrong for him to deny this person communion. Did not Jesus himself sip wine with many sinners.
48 posted on 04/19/2008 2:18:11 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“DO THIS in memory of me.”

Unless:

a. You’re a sinner.
b. You didn’t go to Confession.
c. You tolerate sinning.
d. You’re a Protestant, a Jew, or a Heathen.
e. You were never baptized.
f. You’re otherwise excommunicated according to Papal Bull.


49 posted on 04/19/2008 2:20:26 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Well just dang people! Ya know he could be abstaining from sexual relations with his third wife [snark]


50 posted on 04/19/2008 2:22:38 PM PDT by nettles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33; Bratch

“I always wondered what he was writing. It seems to be important since Scripture states twice that he was writing on the ground. I had a very good friend who always thought that he was writing the names of the accusors who had also slept with this woman.”

What I always used to wonder (before learning that this was a spurious passage in the gospel of John, http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=1316 http://jimmyakin.typepad.com/defensor_fidei/2006/08/the_woman_caugh.html
http://www.bible-researcher.com/adult.html ), was why, when the Pharisees brought this woman to him, Jesus didn’t say right off: “Where’s the guy?” since adultery is by its nature not the sin of a solitary person.


51 posted on 04/19/2008 2:24:54 PM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

“I repeat, no church should deny anyone the right to communion.”

Communion is not a right, it is a memorial act of obedience: “Do this in remembrance of me,” that signifies a claim of unity with the Body of Christ.

Churches and purported church members who turn a blind eye to another purported member’s notorious (public) and unrepentant behavior are as much in rebellion against God as that individual, and equally subject to the Matt 7:21-23. Your argument is not with me (who has no authority over you, and no office to pass judgment on you, but nevertheless I do have a duty to confront you, in love, with the truth) but with the Author of Scripture. I leave you to Him.


52 posted on 04/19/2008 2:35:33 PM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

After marrying Heinz, Kerry received an annullment on his first marriage, so the divorce thing is not a hindrance to his taking Communion.


53 posted on 04/19/2008 2:45:48 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66

***Isn’t it also against the Chuch’s teachings for priests to molest little boys? And yet those same men took (and offered) communion for many years.....***

YES, it’s against the Church’s teachings, and those priests have been dealt with.

YES, there are OTHER churches who have had the same problem, and we can pray that THEY have been dealt with, as I suspect they have been.

SO, why is it that you’re attacking the Catholic Church again?


54 posted on 04/19/2008 2:59:25 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Jim, It is NOT necessary to go to Confession each week in order to receive Communion as long as you are not guilty of a mortal sin.


55 posted on 04/19/2008 3:07:48 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter

***Peloseee and ketchup man received too. I blame the priest who served them.***

Don’t bother yourself about it, Cub. A Greater Power will take care of those who CLAIM to be Catholics and defy the Church, especially those who choose the most public place to do it.


56 posted on 04/19/2008 3:15:09 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

You’re right, but how does one bribe the diocese to get an annullment after 18 years of marrage and 2 kids?


57 posted on 04/19/2008 3:17:00 PM PDT by Bommer (Hmmm who to vote for? A Far leftist? A Radical Leftist? Or a Republican that enjoys being a Leftist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Oh, I love that, ops. LOL!


58 posted on 04/19/2008 3:18:18 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

you said it. Couldn’t have been at a more public venue than that Mass. I think it was a slap in the face to the Pope and to the rest of us who are NOT for abortion. You are correct though...they will face a greater power one day.


59 posted on 04/19/2008 3:28:25 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
You are going by "rules". The one thing you are not getting is this: When Christ died on that cross he shed his blood for ALL Mankind, rather, for the sins of all mankind. Now we know that we ALL still sin so does that mean that no one should rightfully take communion? No my friend anyone can take communion and if they are not right with the Lord when they do, that is up to the only person that knows their heart and that is not the Priest/Pastor/or do good righteous but Jesus Christ the Lord and He only.

So I suggest that we let the Lord do the judging on who is right with Him and not a mere man.

60 posted on 04/19/2008 3:31:44 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson