Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imagery confirms underground nuclear sub base in China
Pakistan Defence ^ | 04/17/08 | Richard D Fisher Jr

Posted on 04/19/2008 8:24:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

The sub base is at Yalong Bay


1 posted on 04/19/2008 8:24:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 04/19/2008 8:25:03 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Imagery confirms underground nuclear sub base in China

I'm not claiming to be the sharpest tool in the barn but aren't subs supposed to go underwater?
3 posted on 04/19/2008 8:27:36 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah

“I’m not claiming to be the sharpest tool in the barn but aren’t subs supposed to go underwater?”

My thought exactly. Apparently they bury their nuke subs. LOL


4 posted on 04/19/2008 8:29:18 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah
If the entrances to the sub pens are under water and the pens themselves are underground, it's going to be a lot harder to tell if chicom subs are prowling.

When we send a satellite over Poljarni, we can tell if Russian subs are there or not and step up alertness appropriately.

If I were a betting man, I'd say the chicoms are planning a first strike and don't want to risk satellites exposing their movements until after the first nukes fly.

5 posted on 04/19/2008 8:37:36 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Hard to grasp a nuke sub base in line of sight of two Western resort hotels and a golf course - particularly knowing the Chinese fetish for secrecy.
6 posted on 04/19/2008 8:38:44 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Oooh!! I want one!!!


7 posted on 04/19/2008 8:41:50 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

I guess they haven’t come to grips with that Mutually Assured Destruction thing yet. I am sure we have enough boomers within striking range of China to turn that country into a nuclear wasteland in a matter of minutes. And now that we know of their pens you can rest assured that we will have more fast attacks patrolling that area.


8 posted on 04/19/2008 8:43:43 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
IF we plant sonar arrays in international waters outside the base, that will tell us when the submarines sortie, as well as which subs are making that sortie. That can be done with a Los Angeles-class sub. I don't think it is for a surprise attack, but so their subs can survive conventional air bombing from a superior U.S. force.
9 posted on 04/19/2008 8:44:04 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: norton

I’ll bet they didn’t realize we had satellites with X-Ray vision too! Rickshaw Rik not soooo smaaaaaht.


10 posted on 04/19/2008 8:44:47 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
If I were a betting man, I'd say the chicoms are planning a first strike and don't want to risk satellites exposing their movements until after the first nukes fly.

Damn, that's a scary thought.

11 posted on 04/19/2008 8:45:03 AM PDT by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I don’t see any reason why China can’t build a navy that will rival ours, or even go us one better. They have the technology, thanks to the treachery of the Clinton’s, and almost all of our money, thanks to unrestricted free trade, so what’s to stop them from having a more powerful navy, army, and air force?


12 posted on 04/19/2008 8:45:46 AM PDT by epow ("Necessity is the plea for infringement of every human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
I'd say the chicoms are planning a first strike and don't want to risk satellites exposing their movements until after the first nukes fly.

Who would they be planning to strike? Surely not the U.S. as we are among their best customers?

Of course if the dems win and shut down WalMart and impose protectionism, who knows?

13 posted on 04/19/2008 8:48:49 AM PDT by cerberus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: epow
Nato designation of the first Chinese boomers should be “Slick” and “Hildebeast.”
14 posted on 04/19/2008 8:48:55 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eurale
That way their leaking reactors don't poison the populous. Russian techology, Russian problems
15 posted on 04/19/2008 8:51:32 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah

MAD requires a desire to preserve ones people.

Considering the enormous landmass that is china and the disdain they hold for their people, you have to wonder if they wouldn’t consider the loss of 50%+ of their population an acceptable price to decapitate America.

The Russians were overwhelmingly paranoid but essentially rational, I don’t think the same can be said of the chinese leadership.


16 posted on 04/19/2008 8:52:09 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

A very valid point. I think they would be willing to lose even more than half. Which is why Bejing and their leadership must be evaporated first.


17 posted on 04/19/2008 8:56:48 AM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
If I were a betting man, I'd say the chicoms are planning a first strike and don't want to risk satellites exposing their movements until after the first nukes fly.

Relax, China and North Korea are harmless. That's why the United States must plunge into a war with Iran as soon as possible.

At least, that's what the neocons keep telling everyone.


18 posted on 04/19/2008 9:08:35 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cerberus

The chicoms are milking the cow before they slaughter it.

Our status as consumer vassal in no way insulates us. If the chinese government truly wants world domination, the singular threat to that dominion is the U.S.

Besides, our economy is currently viewed as weak and growing weaker, we are militarily tied down in the middle east, our forces are tired and equipment is in need of repair and replacement. We are the weakest we’ve been militarily in decades and weakness encourages aggression by ones foes.

G_d grant that I’m badly wrong in my assessment.


19 posted on 04/19/2008 9:10:28 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

I sincerely hope you’re right, but I don’t see why they would take the time and spend the money to create underground bases to stave off a conventional attack when they are certainly going to have plenty of warning that a conventional air and sea force is inbound.

The day of sneak attacks are long past.

Besides, the chinese have more than enough intelligence agents in the military and Washington to let them know what’s coming months in advance.


20 posted on 04/19/2008 9:15:24 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson