Skip to comments.
Polygamous-sect children ordered to stay in Texas custody (DNA Tests Ordered)
From the Associated Press ^
| 5:52 PM PDT, April 18, 2008
| Associated Press
Posted on 04/18/2008 6:30:59 PM PDT by granite
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-467 next last
1
posted on
04/18/2008 6:31:00 PM PDT
by
granite
To: granite
Good...God bless these children and help the authorities protect them from rape and abuse.
To: granite
From what I’ve read, some of these children are going to be found to be unrelated to any of the mothers. I wonder if the parents that were ordered to send their children to the compound are going to fess up?
3
posted on
04/18/2008 6:36:52 PM PDT
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Yes, because foster and state care isn’t rife with rape and abuse.. btw.. anyone come up with any real evidence other than a bogus phone call yet? OH , I forgot.. damn the constitution.. we’re on a witchhunt.
4
posted on
04/18/2008 6:37:56 PM PDT
by
Awestruck
(All the usual suspects)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
God bless these children and help the authorities protect them from rape and abuse.
Dittoes. At least Jim Jones had the guts to get himself to another country to do his evil deeds. I’d like to see major jail time for the perps here.
5
posted on
04/18/2008 6:38:27 PM PDT
by
eleni121
(EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Good...God bless these children and help the authorities protect them from rape and abuse.Sentiments I share as well.
6
posted on
04/18/2008 6:38:54 PM PDT
by
PennsylvaniaMom
(PaMom--a broken glass DINO til 4/23/08)
To: granite
Good...we’ll finally learn the answer to the question, “Who’s your daddy?” And we’ll find out when the women became pregnant. That ought to put some of these despicable men in prison, where getting their sexual urges satisfied will be problematical.
To: mollynme
Maybe it’s easier to groom a little girl to be a child bride if you’re just her “assigned” mother.
8
posted on
04/18/2008 6:39:17 PM PDT
by
Jedidah
To: granite
Good thing this is happening to a despised group, as it's so much easier to accept the wholesale grab of genetic material to enter into government databases. Whoo-hoo for establishing the precedent of genetically testing victims.
I don't agree with what this cult does, but when you start hearing about ‘reeducation’ by government authorities, it strikes me as a far larger problem than solution.
9
posted on
04/18/2008 6:41:16 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: Awestruck
Everyone who wants to know what this cult is like and how the children, women, and men in it suffer, go here:
http://www.childbrides.org/
and read some of the “True Stories.”
To: Awestruck
“anyone come up with any real evidence other than a bogus phone call yet?”
How do you think the underaged girls got pregnant? Don’t you think that qualifies as evidence?
11
posted on
04/18/2008 6:43:43 PM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
(A true patriot will do anything to keep a Democrat out of the White House.)
To: granite
More than 400 children taken from a ranch run by a polygamous sect will stay in state custody and be subject to genetic testing, a judge ruled Friday Way to go judge.
12
posted on
04/18/2008 6:53:52 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: DugwayDuke
Dont you think that qualifies as evidence?The same evidence can be found in any, and probably every, Jr. High school in this country.
13
posted on
04/18/2008 6:56:00 PM PDT
by
SouthTexas
(If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!)
To: DugwayDuke
How do you think the underaged girls got pregnant? Dont you think that qualifies as evidence? I have noted there are several people here that don't care about these little girls it is all about their personal agenda's.
14
posted on
04/18/2008 6:56:10 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
Polygamous sect. State custody.
It's hard to tell which is the frying pan and which is the fire.
15
posted on
04/18/2008 6:56:51 PM PDT
by
jabchae
To: Awestruck
Let's see...we have
a sworn affadavitt by an investigator as well as the testimony offered by two expert witnesses so far. Plus, we have the fact that the sect's leaders encourage sex with minor girls, which was proven in Warren Jeffs' trial.
Are these people presumed innocent. Yep. Is the state offering no evidence? Nope.
16
posted on
04/18/2008 6:58:10 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: SouthTexas
“The same evidence can be found in any, and probably every, Jr. High school in this country.”
Name the jr. high schools that promote marraige between girls under 15 and men over 40.
17
posted on
04/18/2008 6:59:07 PM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
(A true patriot will do anything to keep a Democrat out of the White House.)
To: SouthTexas
The same evidence can be found in any, and probably every, Jr. High school in this country. Is that your way of saying that some young girl making the mistake of taking her cloths off and getting pregnant is the same thing as being raped by some old fart and after being brain washed into thinking they were doing it for god.
Sick!
18
posted on
04/18/2008 6:59:59 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: kingu
Good thing this is happening to a despised group, as it's so much easier to accept the wholesale grab of genetic material to enter into government databases. Whoo-hoo for establishing the precedent of genetically testing victims. Sorry, but that's paranoia. Parenthood needs to be established if any child custody determinations are going to be made properly.
19
posted on
04/18/2008 7:00:34 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: jabchae
It's hard to tell which is the frying pan and which is the fire. Then you have a problem above your shoulders, that only the old style French could aide you with.
20
posted on
04/18/2008 7:01:52 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-467 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson