Posted on 04/18/2008 5:35:11 AM PDT by Sopater
Oh yeah. The Irish blow people up all the time. Haven’t you heard?
Buncha terrorists, the whole lot.
That's not true of all Irish...
...just the angry, sober ones ;-)
“Israel? avoid it as much as possible....but ya gotta break eggs to make an omelet.”
Break eggs??? Your “plan” would destroy it.
Oh well, tough noogies, I guess. Who needs them Jews anyway. /s
Did 2 nukes ‘destroy’ Japan? And Japan’s a lot smaller than the middle east..
“Apparently, it is “kill everyone but me.”
Sounds that way. The tiny sticking point, however, is that turning the middle East into glass will almost certainly bring nukes dropping our way. And raise oil prices to about $500 per barrel.
Ah, but as long as we kill lots of Muslims, it’s worth it.
Bah, details.
“Did 2 nukes ‘destroy’ Japan? And Japan’s a lot smaller than the middle east..”
If we turn the middle East into “glass,” as was suggested, the whole area would be heavily contaminated. Israel is surrounded by Muslim countries and, in fact, is home to many Muslims itself. They would need to be killed somehow. Perhaps people could still live in some areas, but, as happened in Japan, untold numbers would eventually die from radiation-induced illnesses.
Sounds like you’ve been bitten by the PC bug.
Sooner or later it’ll have to be done. Just depends on how much of ours die in the meantime.
Clean H-Bombs
On the average, about 50 percent of the power of an H-bomb results from thermonuclear-fusion reactions and the other 50 percent from fission that occurs in the A-bomb trigger and in the uranium jacket. A clean H-bomb is defined as one in which a significantly smaller proportion than 50 percent of the energy arises from fission. Because fusion does not produce any radioactive products directly, the fallout from a clean weapon is less than that from a normal or average H-bomb of the same total power. If an H-bomb were made with no uranium jacket but with a fission trigger, it would be relatively clean. Perhaps as little as 5 percent of the total explosive force might result from fission; the weapon would thus be 95 percent clean. The enhanced-radiation fusion bomb, also called the neutron bomb, which has been tested by the United States and other nuclear powers, does not release long-lasting radioactive fission products. However, the large number of neutrons released in thermonuclear reactions is known to induce radioactivity in materials, especially earth and water, within a relatively small area around the explosion. Thus the neutron bomb is considered a tactical weapon because it can do serious damage on the battlefield, penetrating tanks and other armored vehicles and causing death or serious injury to exposed individuals, without producing the radioactive fallout that endangers people or structures miles awa
I love the NYPost, but sometimes they go a bit off the rails. They’re building plans. Not much top secret there. You can probably find them in the library.
So that's how Cheney did it!
The highest bidder has not shown up yet.
Neutron bomb.
Yes, something to that effect.
Emotions aside, this is just another building going up, it's not Top Secret.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.