Posted on 04/17/2008 10:46:15 PM PDT by Aristotelian
Who cares about this shrill anyway? I’m waiting for her to come out and endorse Osama Hussein (after her fawning and shmeful 1-hr long praise of him on MTP a couple of weeks ago).
Bravo, Peggy, Bravo!!!
Sun, skin cancer.......
.....Sun, skin cancer.......
.....Sun, vitimin D....
Benefits outweigh the risk
I don't see any 'obvious' VP picks out there. Bush has so neglected his role as party leader that he has allowed several of the better conservative office holders to get picked off. Santorum is gone. George Allen is gone. That's just off the top of my head. "Conventional Wisdom" says McCain should pick a conservative runningmate, but the one's with national stature are damaged goods.
Santorum got beat by idiotic republicans in Pa who wanted to “teach a lesson” because he dared to endorce Specter rather than Toomey.. had nothing to do with Bush, just foolish petty voters in PA.. who have have a guy as their Senator who is harder to find than waldo, and less qualified than Fauxbama.
You didn’t go far enough in your analysis. Santorum was carrying Bush’s water for him when he supported Specter over Toomey.
No, Santorum was putting party before himself. Toomey could not win the general, and holding onto the Senate was more important than pandering.
I hate to say it, but Hillary’s appearance has been very mannish. We’ll see if she tries to be more feminine in appearance at some point.
>>She asserted that President Bush had been “unready” for the office, did not understand its “constitutional character,” exhibited in his decisions an “ideological disdain.”<<
“Ideological disdain?” Sounds like Obama. Hillary Clinton is keeping her disdain under wraps for now, but make no mistake, she has plenty.
Democrats’ Damaging Brawl - Clinton and Obama are paving the way to a McCain win.
The Washington Post | April 20, 2008 | David S. Broder
Posted on 04/19/2008 10:23:27 PM PDT by Aristotelian
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2004238/posts
Wright Is Out To Destroy Obama...says Time’s Joe Klein
Townhall.com | 4/28/08 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 04/28/2008 9:39:18 AM PDT by LJayne
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2008118/posts
Hillary Clinton has just the right strategy â for 2012
St. Louis Post-Dispatch | 4-25-08 | Bill McClellan
Posted on 04/25/2008 11:46:37 AM PDT by kingattax
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2007003/posts
[snip] It became clear a couple of months ago that Barack Obama was going to get the nomination. Given the way the delegates are allotted on a proportional basis rather than on a winner-take-all basis, Obama’s lead became insurmountable during his winning streak. And there was never a realistic hope that the superdelegates would overrule the will of the voters. If they did, there would be chaos. The party would risk alienating its single most faithful bloc â African-Americans... You’ve got to hope that [Obama] loses the general election. If he wins in 2008, he’ll run for re-election in 2012. That means... Hillary would be... 69 by [2016]... Also, the odds will be against the Democrat in 2016. This is true no matter how Obama does in 2012. [end]
To the contrary, I find brutal honesty quite refreshing.
When I wrote that, I had my tongue planted firmly in my cheek.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.