identity politics at its ugliest
that’s so funny!
the world’s most intelligent female is having problems.
how can that be?
Hear that, democrat ladies? You’re all supposed to always support the woman. That’s all they care about. If you have breasts you can only back other candidates with breasts.
Hear that, democrat blacks? You are all supposed to support the black candidate.
I love this because it shows that when you boil ‘enlightened liberalism’ down to its core, superficial qualities such as skin color and gender are paramount issues over anything else. The people who spout platitudes about being color-blind and gender-blind are revealed as complete, utter hypocrites because we have proof of how THEY view the world. They truly believe that only blacks can represent blacks, and only women can represent women. They are total hypocrites.
And thank you Lord, for allowing us to see them as they truly are. Just let them continue to keep flapping their mouths about this, and more will see them for the hypocrites they are.
I was approached by a neighbor recently who, probably because we don’t know each other well, assumed I was voting for Hillary.
When I told her that I’m 1). Republican and 2). that Hillary is a pig in a pantsuit who I would never vote for, she scolded me about my duty to women.
This is the second time I’ve been scolded in this way be other women. I have friends who have had the same sort of experience.
Democrats cannot release themselves from identity politics long enough to see the flaws in their thinking.
This article is so perfectly revealing.
It's about the Feminist (sex-identity politics) plantation.
It's quite a conundrum. If a female, backed by Emily's List (and put into office) is not about getting female to use her own smarts/gravitas/opinion to make law, then it really means that Emily's List doesn't think women have smarts and/or independent thought apparatus or acumen, in general.
Ultimately, it means that the women that Emily's List promotes are mere blobs of maleable tissues -- or rather, should be.
Question of the day: Does Emily's List propose to abort its own maleable tissues (oops, I mean, female candidates?)
From Rev Wright to Rev-Emily's List - What a Whirled!!
These stories that try to humanize the political race are just plain stupid. Who cares what the woman’s 12 year old daughter thinks? Is that supposed to hint at Obama’s rock star qualities? These reporters get more pathetic all the time.