Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
If you read my posts I have not supported the movie nor have I been critical of it. I have questioned your citation of Scientific American as an authority, especially when it has a history of being overtly incorrect on occasion. Again, you show your bias.
78 posted on 04/17/2008 6:22:51 PM PDT by tongass kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: tongass kid
If you read my posts I have not supported the movie nor have I been critical of it. I have questioned your citation of Scientific American as an authority, especially when it has a history of being overtly incorrect on occasion. Again, you show your bias.
Uuum... you really don't understand science. Remember Luminiferous aether?
83 posted on 04/17/2008 6:26:49 PM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: tongass kid

Post 78 to you was in error, my bad. Thanks


107 posted on 04/17/2008 6:51:14 PM PDT by tongass kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: tongass kid
Again you show your ignorance.

I never sourced Scientific American. I am in no way dependent upon the popular press for my knowledge of Science or the preposterousness of the “Incompetent Design” movement and their ‘cdesign proponentists”.

And yes I have a bias. I prefer truth to lies. I prefer Science to shoddy theology. I prefer education to propaganda. Bias is a good thing in these instances, and only a postmodernist liberal thinks bias is an unequivocally bad term.

117 posted on 04/17/2008 7:04:16 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson