You are getting closer to the problem with the fossil record. The record contains many creatures great and small as observed by Darwin and others, it just does not contain the many transition form that would tell us where “they come from”.
The fossil record tells us that the life forms are there, it just does not tell us where they come from. We are making some progress, and I was hoping that we may perhaps move out of the comparative morphology and dirt to other areas.
I am getting closer? Please spare me your condescension. How could I get any “closer” when you haven't provided any actual information. All I have done so far is diagnose your quibble with the fossil record that it doesn't show change that is “gradual” or “transitional” enough to satisfy what you think it should show.
The fact that you are looking for horribly mutated fossils shows just how uninformed and unthoughtout your approach to the subject is.
Answer any of my questions yet?
No.
Where do you suppose these fossils come from?
Is your assumption that they all came about at the same time?
Do you actually think that the fossil record supports THAT preposterous notion?
Please feel free to display your ignorance of genetics as well. I can't wait to hear how all the genomic data that indicates common ancestry is all a huge blow to the theory of Evolution.