Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tongass kid
And in the genetics lab, (you would agree?) Darwin's theory has met with BRILLIANT success.

You cannot seem to answer any of the VERY SIMPLE questions I put to you about where you think emerging species come from, or what exact narrative you think the fossil record supports.

Are you being deliberately evasive or do you really have no knowledge or opinion on these issues.

233 posted on 04/18/2008 12:14:50 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
You have correctly stated the problem. Darwin thought that he would find your “emerging species”. They have not been found. The record is redundant with fully formed non-emerging species. I suggest those that are interested in Darwinain evolution read his 1859 book. The book contains no complex scientific language because it was written at a time when life science was in its infancy's. You might say the book is so simple that even a cave man could understand it. Now if you would like to discuss non-Darwinain evolution as related to genetics and biochem there exist evidence that is troubling to the theory of evolution.
234 posted on 04/18/2008 12:30:23 PM PDT by tongass kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson