Evolution doesn’t cover the origin of life. That is another field of science.
Which field of science would that be?
Technically true. Evolution itself, as a pseudoscience, doesn't cover the origin of life. Evolutionism, as a philosophy, does.
” Evolution doesn’t cover the origin of life. That is another field of science “
LOL Pricless ! You don`t get to set the terms of the debate since logic demands that evolutionists prove how the first protein made itself which logically led to monkies becoming men.
Darwin has been proven wrong so many times it`s now become redundant, origin of baleen in whales being one.
Even Dawkins noted that scientific theories (neo darwinism) can rely on only so much “luck” before they cease to be credible.
Nice try junoir.
Yes, the one that we call “history”.
As in, what happened way back when that we can’t observe or repeat.
If schools didn’t insist on teaching speculative history as science, there wouldn’t be much argument against evolution, which at it’s core is a simple theory whose mechanisms, if not it’s results, can be replicated.
Then why do all General Biology textbooks I've seen (and I've seen a lot) cover it under the topic of "Evolution"?
Could it be that the editors of all those General Biology textbooks are ignorant? Or what?