Actually, you are saying something. In your attempt to disprove that other poster's point (can't remember who it was right this sec), you posted a link to a Wikipedia article about the Miller-Urey experiment, presumably because you thought that this "proves" that "lightning can make amino acids", contra what the other poster said.
While it is "technically" true that an electric arc can generate rudimentary amino acids, it produces a racemic mix (among the various other scientific problems with trying to transfer the M-U results to an hypothesis about the supposed early earth) which would be completely unusable from a biological perspective. Hence all the nonsense about "directing clays" and "crystals which selected for handedness" and all that other speculation which has proven unsupported by laboratory investigation.
Actually, you are saying something. In your attempt to disprove that other poster's point (can't remember who it was right this sec), you posted a link to a Wikipedia article about the Miller-Urey experiment, presumably because you thought that this "proves" that "lightning can make amino acids", contra what the other poster said.WTF, are you really this stupid? Actually *read* the beginning of the thread. You'd look like less of an idiot. Here's a hint, it involves *proteins* and *amino acids*. When you can figure out the difference get back to me.While it is "technically" true that an electric arc can generate rudimentary amino acids, it produces a racemic mix (among the various other scientific problems with trying to transfer the M-U results to an hypothesis about the supposed early earth) which would be completely unusable from a biological perspective. Hence all the nonsense about "directing clays" and "crystals which selected for handedness" and all that other speculation which has proven unsupported by laboratory investigation.