[cookcounty]

Gotta run, so I'll leave you with this:

Taking a species, and little by little trashing its DNA is a retrogression, a Devolution. (look it up, it's word, ---not that any self-respection Evolutionist would use it).

The processes by which tapestries unravel are not the same as the processes by which tapestries are woven together, ---not by a l-o-o-o-o-ng shot. Good night, may the Great Not-Actor bless you richly.

[ketsu]

Gotta run, so I'll leave you with this: Taking a species, and little by little trashing its DNA is a retrogression, a Devolution. (look it up, it's word, ---not that any self-respection Evolutionist would use it).

The processes by which tapestries unravel are not the same as the processes by which tapestries are woven together, ---not by a l-o-o-o-o-ng shot. Good night, may the Great Not-Actor bless you richly.

Not sure what you're trying to say here, but I'll point out the evolution is *cyclic*, see my earlier post. Tapestries unravel and weave back together all the time, often in the same way(regular and marsupial wolves for example).

[allmendream]

Ever tired of being wrong?

(”Devolution. (look it up, its a word,-—not that any self-respecting Evolutionist would use it”)

1: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Feb;57(Pt 2):201-6. Links
Evolution and devolution of minimal standards for descriptions of species of the class Mollicutes: analysis of two Spiroplasma descriptions.Whitcomb RF.
PMID: 17267949 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17267949?ordinalpos=29&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

[tongass kid]

I have enjoyed your comments. It appears to me that you have been attempting to explain “microevolution” or the earlier title “variation within kind”. In November 1980 a conference of some of the world's leaking evolutionary biologists, billed as historic, was held at the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History on the topic of “macroevolution. Reporting on the conference in the journal Science, Roger Lewis wrote:
The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying miroevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At the risk of doing violence to the positions of some of the people at the meeting, the answere can be given as a clear,No.
Additionally, Francisco Ayala (associate Professor of Genetics, University of California) was quoted as saying: ...But I am now convinced from what the paleontologist say that small changes do not accumulate..

Thought you might enjoy the quotes.