“Although the experiments were not perfect, they were not fatally flawed.”
Except the experiments didn’t provide an example of natural selection because they were botched.
What do you think of the circular logic homologies?
That ‘talkorigins’ site claims: “Homology is not defined as similarity due to common ancestry and then used as evidence for common ancestry.”
From my college text: “Structures that are shared by species on the basis of descent from a common ancestor are called homologies. Homologies alone are reliable indicators of evolutionary relationship.”
Its clear that my text is engaged in circular reasoning despite what the ‘talkorigins’ apologists say.