Posted on 04/17/2008 5:13:56 AM PDT by Invisigoth
I thought North Star Writers Group was generally pretty good. Have they suddenly decided they love lefties and they hate anyone who asks tough questions of lefties?
This is how the writer insults his audience. Those things would be nothing to some folks, and much to others, but it is not nothing to all folks.
This is why the MSM is in decline, because they repeatedly insult their audience.
Questions of character are non-stories. This is why the Dems didn't care that the President of the United States lied under oath. ABC did a great job. I was pleasantly surprised.
FYA: “But I had no idea that half the debate would be devoted to questions about nothing.”
Hmmm. Questions of character come to mind.
This show keeps getting better and better. This is all being brought about by the willingness of the liberals to get in bed with ANY group just for the votes it will get them. Now their chickens are all coming home to roost and the Dems have been presented with a bill for payment by all the special interest groups they have aligned with.
Maybe it's coming to light that unsubstantial candidates are incapable of dealing with substantial policy issues?
Imagine pressing the candidates on which taxes they plan to raise: like capital gains and payroll. Better to keep voters in the dark?
This was the spin on PMSNBC last nite. I didn't see the debate, but I caught a little post debate coverage. These are not nonstories. They are, in card playing terms, tells. And they tell us that O and H are lefty loons.
It became obvious last night the the liberal MSM that their candidates are in deep national doo-doo........ they are now all in full metal spin....
North Star Writers Group is an equal opportunity syndicate with six liberal writers and six conservatives. They don’t push agendas, they put forth opinions.
even when they did ask anything about policy the pat answer was “ Don’t ask for specifics just believe us when we say we will be better than Bush”. I mean come on!! Do they have to start every answer with bush or the current administration.
>> the moderators, Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, asked shamefully superficial and gotcha-oriented questions
“Journalists” are pure garbage. They are supposed to be the public’s cynical watchdog (and attack dog!) against government. Instead, not only are they in the tank for a particular agenda, the overwhelming majority of them are shallow, and dumb as a box of rocks.
Can’t wait for the (R) vs (D) debates. Not!!
If McCain has any sense (can’t get a clear read on that), he will insist on at least a couple debates “French style”: no duplicitous moderators in the tank for the Dems at all. The candidates face off across a table from each other and they ask EACH OTHER questions. No time limit for the answers, talk over each other all you want, the public is watching!
Not only would that debate style be more informative — it would be more entertaining.
The Washington Compost’s Tom Shales — a hefty lefty who loves to trash people like Kathy Lee Gifford, rightfully so — wrote a stinging review, not of the candidates, but about Gibson & The Water Boy:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/17/AR2008041700013.html?hpid=topnews
Worth the read!
Drudge is headlining a Shales screed blaming Stephanopolos and Gibson for embarrassing BO. The BObots are now alarmed at ABC news.
Thanks for the link. I did indeed read the article.
Problem is — Shales has a dog in the fight (Obama) and is miffed that, “To this observer, ABC’s coverage seemed slanted against Obama. “.
He isn’t really complaining about the lack of hard hitting moderation, as much as whining that the shallowness “gotcha’d” HIS candidate too much.
Wait and see what Shales has to say in the REAL debates between the Donk convention and election day. He’ll be just fine with “shallow”, as long as the moderators are piling on the (R).
Ayers was a bomber 40 years ago but Obama served on a board with him for years as recently as 2002. I don't want a President who serves on boards with people who bomb the Pentagon and wish they'd done more; question of character and judgment.
>> These are not nonstories. They are, in card playing terms, tells. And they tell us that O and H are lefty loons.
Right.
And we’re being introduced to the new Demorat meme for dealing with their candidates’ multiple character problems:
It’s a smear. It’s hiding the “truth” about america. It’s the VRWC attack machine, again. Don’t talk about our character flaws, let’s get back to talking about W and his administration.
The author sounds bitter.
Must be a result of the new rifle range at his church.
Since both of them are running on the Wizard of Oz platform of promise them everything but give them nothing, it should be the first and foremost thing to see what is behind the curtain.
If they have to BS the little things, embellish their characters, spend half their time explaining what they "meant" to say and covering for their spouses' and acquaintances' lack of ethics; what does it matter how they would do anything else?
Questions about nothing sure showed a lot of something lacking in ZerObama and Hillliary.
I sent ABC an E-mail to congratulate them. The best debate so far...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.