Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist

I think there should always be two or three witnesses, not just one. That’s what the Bible says. Just one witness is too likely to be mistaken or deliberately lying.

I’d consider physical evidence as a witness. For instance, if this guy was caught pawning her stuff or if his DNA was on her couch or whatever.


81 posted on 04/16/2008 8:27:06 PM PDT by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Marie2
I’d consider physical evidence as a witness. For instance, if this guy was caught pawning her stuff or if his DNA was on her couch or whatever.

What if she invited him home, initiated sexual intercourse, then had regrets in the morning and called him out for raping her? It does happen, you know, despite what the shrieking fem-hags say.

-ccm

124 posted on 04/16/2008 10:17:13 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson