Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist
“Barry Sheck and the Innocence Project are a bunch of Commie Pinko Liberals.”

Please, no strawmen. If you watched any of the Simpson trial you are well aware of Mr. Sheck’s trustworthiness on the question of guilt or innocence.

If someone says and does whatever he can do free one guilty person (Simpson), he may do it again.

I have no evidence, or reason to believe any fraud has take place. I am simply inquiring about the precautions being used to make certain there is none.

Given the fact that cases like this one are used as arguments against the death penalty and the fact that there many people vehemently opposed to the death penalty, it is not “paranoid” or foolish to want to make sure there is absolutely no possibility of fraud.

79 posted on 04/16/2008 8:24:15 PM PDT by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Jonah Johansen
The original requirement was for the state to make it's case, and if there was cause for doubt, to acquit.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Not the other way 'round.

/johnny

84 posted on 04/16/2008 8:30:31 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson