Please, no strawmen. If you watched any of the Simpson trial you are well aware of Mr. Sheck’s trustworthiness on the question of guilt or innocence.
If someone says and does whatever he can do free one guilty person (Simpson), he may do it again.
I have no evidence, or reason to believe any fraud has take place. I am simply inquiring about the precautions being used to make certain there is none.
Given the fact that cases like this one are used as arguments against the death penalty and the fact that there many people vehemently opposed to the death penalty, it is not “paranoid” or foolish to want to make sure there is absolutely no possibility of fraud.
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Not the other way 'round.
/johnny