Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mothers of Sect Children Forced to Leave
Google News ^ | 14 April 2008 | By JENNIFER DOBNER and MICHAEL GRACZYK

Posted on 04/14/2008 8:17:56 PM PDT by BlackVeil

SAN ANGELO, Texas (AP) — Texas officials who took 416 children from a polygamist retreat into state custody sent many of their mothers away Monday, as a judge and lawyers struggled with a legal and logistical morass in one of the biggest child-custody cases in U.S. history.

Of the 139 women who voluntarily left the compound with their children since an April 3 raid, only those with children 4 or younger were allowed to continue staying with them, said Marissa Gonzales, spokewoman for the state Children's Protective Services agency. She did not know how many women stayed.

"It is not the normal practice to allow parents to accompany the child when an abuse allegation is made," Gonzales said.

The women were given a choice: Return to the Eldorado ranch of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a renegade Mormon sect, or go to another safe location. Some women chose the latter, Gonzales said.

The state is accusing the sect of physically and sexually abusing the youngsters and wants to strip their parents of custody and place the children in foster care or put them up for adoption. The sheer size of the case was an obstacle.

"Quite frankly, I'm not sure what we're going to do," Texas District Judge Barbara Walther said after a conference that included three to four dozen attorneys either representing or hoping to represent youngsters.

The mothers were taken away Monday after they and the children were taken by bus under heavy security out of historic Fort Concho, where they had been staying, to the San Angelo Coliseum, which holds nearly 5,000 people and is used for hockey games, rodeos and concerts. The polygamist retreat is about 45 miles south of San Angelo.

Some of the youngsters' mothers complained to Gov. Rick Perry that the children were getting sick in the crowded fort. About 20 children had a mild case of chickenpox, said Dr. Sandra Guerra-Cantu with the state Health Department.

Perry spokesman Robert Black said the governor did not believe the children were being housed in poor conditions at the West Texas fort. "Let's be honest here, this is not the Ritz," Black said, but he called the accommodations "clean and neat."

CPS said the move to the coliseum had been in the works since last week, but couldn't be done sooner because the facility had been booked for another event and had to be cleaned and set up for the children.

CPS also said about two dozen teenage boys were moved to a facility outside San Angelo with the judge's permission. "We don't normally say where we place teens," Gonzales said when asked where they were sent.

Monday's courtroom conference was held to work out the ground rules for a court hearing beginning Thursday on the fate of the children.

The judge made no immediate decisions on how the hearing will be carried out. Among the questions left unanswered: Would a courtroom big enough to hold everyone be available at the Tom Green County Courthouse, or would some kind of video link be employed?

Texas bar officials said more than 350 lawyers from across the state have volunteered to represent the children free of charge. Moreover, the 139 mothers who voluntarily left the sect to be with their children will need lawyers, too, to help them fight for custody.

The sheer numbers left the judge perplexed as she considered suggestions from the lawyers for how to handle Thursday's hearing.

"It would seem inefficient to have a witness testify 416 times," the judge offered. "If I gave everybody five minutes, that would be 70 hours."

In an unintended illustration of the problem, Walther gave the lawyers 30 minutes to break into groups and report back to her with ideas. It took almost two hours for everyone to reassemble.

The raid followed a call to a domestic violence hot line from a 16-year-old girl who said she was beaten and raped by her 50-year-old husband.

In addition to becoming a monumental legal morass, the case is proving to be a public-relations headache for the state.

Over the weekend, some of the mothers went on the offensive, complaining the children are falling ill and are frightened and traumatized from living in cramped conditions at the fort, with cots, cribs and playpens lined up side by side.

The secretive nature of the sect — and the indoctrination children receive from birth to mistrust outsiders — have added to the confusion.

Randoll Stout, one of the lawyers who plan to represent some of the children, said the youngsters "seem to change their names. Adults change their names. Children are passed around."

Betty Balli Torres, executive director of the Texas Access to Justice Foundation, said 10 women went into the San Angelo legal aid office last week seeking help and reported there were 100 more women who needed lawyers.

Attorneys began meeting with the women over the weekend. She said it was vital that the mothers be represented by lawyers. Otherwise, they could lose their children — "what we call kind of the death penalty of family law cases," she said.

A church lawyer, Rod Parker, said the 60 or so men remaining on the 1,700-acre ranch have offered to leave the compound if the state would allow the women and children to return to the place with child welfare monitors. But the state Children's Protective Services agency said it had not yet seen the offer and had no comment on it.

The sect practices polygamy in arranged marriages between underage girls and older men. The group has thousands of followers in two side-by-side towns in Arizona and Utah. The sect's prophet and spiritual leader, Warren Jeffs, is in prison for forcing an underage age into a marriage in Utah.

In Salt Lake City, dozens of polygamist wives with children in tow held a rally on the steps of City Hall to denounce the Texas raid. Rally organizers brought 475 wrapped care packages for the children in state custody.

"Reunite these children with their families. Let them go home," said Kent Johnson, an 18-year-old in a pinstripe suit who choked up.

Associated Press reporter Kelley Shannon contributed to this story from Austin.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: compound; cult; polygamy; sect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: awaken2spirit; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; ...
Check out this post.
81 posted on 04/15/2008 9:01:10 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

because texas law has a consent provision.

and

because the prosecution tried before and dropped the ball.

and

because the case STARTED with a flawed warrant

...

how do you rescue someone who does not want to be rescued? (seriously “I am from the government and I am here to help” is not the mantra of customer confidence)

There is a two track path on this case. The social and the legal.

The social will be fixed with a few hundred DNA tests to sort out who belongs to which child. It has to be done. PERIOD.

Second there has to be legal reform in the sense that as a matter of law, a child may have only ONE mother and ONE father. (fixes some other issue too but that is a bonus) There also has to be reform for this 14 to 17 consent provision. Texas must do away with common law marriage as other states have done.

The legal aspects need to be constitutional and hard. Identify the boss wives as any other type of Mob lieutenant and deal with them as accessories.

punt on the bad warrant. Immediatly build secondary branches to the evident to survive the inevitable appeals and survive poison fruit arguments.

FINALLY remember these are children we are dealing with. We must not burn the village to save it. Some we will be able to help to find their way out of the polygamy aspects. Others, who are adults, may simply not want to go. (milton and all that) if they have committed no crime we can’t stop that. These are human beings we are dealing with, they have a right to choose wrongly (for themselves) as much as the right to choose correctly.


82 posted on 04/15/2008 9:02:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: berdie

take a look at that for the 14-17 provisions. Apparently a parent can “consent” to the relations.

Texas also has common law marraige but forbids it to the under 18 crowd.

all at http://www.findlaw.com


83 posted on 04/15/2008 9:11:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: awaken2spirit
I don't claim to know what the answer is, but it is clear to me who the victims are, over and over again. It is the children, and what child would recover from being ripped from their homes, and then their mothers? Enforcing the law is paramount, yes, but how that is done is also paramount. IMO this is not the correct way to do that.
84 posted on 04/15/2008 9:18:36 AM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: awaken2spirit
People used to marry a lot earlier in the 1800's when the Original LDS church was established. You got married right after puberty.

Let's see how that works: People used to marry a lot earlier in the 1800's when the Original LDS church was established. You got married [to dirty old men with multiple wives like Joseph Smith or Brigham Young] right after puberty.

Boy the veneer has really come off the Mormon Church this week. Defending the indefensible. Keep it up. You guys are showing your true colors.

85 posted on 04/15/2008 9:21:52 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

That was intended; this whole action is faulty; the true point lies not in the numbers but in the very fact that the existence of a pregnant teen in a family has never been used to remove all of the children from that family before, to our knowledge.

Remember that these remain allegations without proof and liberty should be deprived only after adjudication.

“Safekeeping” on a scale this size is unprecedented.


86 posted on 04/15/2008 9:24:02 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Quite the opposite-— if there is a pregnant teen in a family where there is suspicion of abuse or neglect, yes, all children will be removed. And honestly, the last time I saw that happen was in a case where Daddy had married Mama with three teenage daughters and proceeded to have a harem (mother complicit and actually helping restrain girls).


87 posted on 04/15/2008 9:27:37 AM PDT by najida (On FR- Everyman is Brad Pitt, Everywoman is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: najida

Cite case, please.


88 posted on 04/15/2008 9:34:28 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

In this county around 1989 to 1991 or so, it made America’s Most Wanted because the parents fled. There were 2 or 3 babies born to the 2 older teens that were adopted by local community members. I believe the girls have long since moved away, changed their names etc.

It was a major scandal because the family was middle class and the girls went to school Folks assumed that they were ‘loose’ (because they kept having kids) but no one noted that they weren’t flirting with, much less dating boys.

If my mother was alive, she’d know all the data. I can look it up, but it may take a while (or longer).


89 posted on 04/15/2008 9:40:10 AM PDT by najida (On FR- Everyman is Brad Pitt, Everywoman is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Harshaw
But to attempt to strip parental rights wholesale from 139 mothers (and an unknown, to me, number of fathers), without any individual determinations that these mothers and fathers are unfit parents ... words fail to describe the horror of this action. In what world does this wholesale breakup of families even begin to sound reasonable? Does anyone believe that the state has made any kind of individual, case-by-case analysis to indicate that each of those parents are unfit? Rather, it’s pretty obvious, at this point, that the state has simply decreed that mere association with a particular religion, even absent any proven or likely abuse with respect to the vast majority of these children, is enough to sever parental rights.

The total bitch of the situation is that you are correct. I have zero sympathy for these pedophiles, but a horrible precedent is being set here.

90 posted on 04/15/2008 9:51:11 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Party ahead of principles; eventually you'll be selling out anything to anyone for the right price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: awaken2spirit
"How is that an improvement over their previous condition? People used to marry a lot earlier in the 1800's when the Original LDS church was established. You got married right after puberty. You had to grow up a lot faster and accept the mantle of manhood and womanhood."

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

91 posted on 04/15/2008 10:13:34 AM PDT by ansel12 (This cult stuff is grossing me out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I am not Mormon, nor am I a polygamist.


92 posted on 04/15/2008 10:28:11 AM PDT by awaken2spirit (When one fornicates with ignorance, the result of that union is chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

I’ve been wondering where the Arabs think they’ll get all their money once they kill all of us. The Chinese? But the Chinese aren’t going to convert to Islam either - and it’s going to take quite a bit of time and effort to kill all of them.

But if they kill all of us, the Chinese won’t have our money to give to the Arabs - or the need for so much oil to run their industries.

Oil isn’t any good for their personal wealth if they insist on murdering their customers.


93 posted on 04/15/2008 10:59:22 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
I thought that too but didn't want to say so. I would not leave my dog with her for five minutes while I was in the next room.

No one has posted it, but immediately after she was on Carolyn Jessop followed. CJ identified her by her voice and said, “That's Kathleen.” She was the one who went to the common husband and told about CJ’s getting ready to leave. CJ made a good point. She wants her freedom but doesn't want anyone else to have it?

This interview was proceeded or followed by a CNN correspondent who was in that UT/AZ town. He said they were intimidated, cornered in their vehicle and that they ran for the AZ line because all the police on the Utah side were flds. You could tell the guy was scared.

On the same broadcast they mentioned there had been another call from the same girl from Arizona. Possible several other calls. Their conclusion was she had been spirited away from the Texas compound.

94 posted on 04/15/2008 10:59:55 AM PDT by Pebcak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

I read that post. I wonder if this weirdo is on UTube.


95 posted on 04/15/2008 11:01:49 AM PDT by rightazrain (Stop Obama/Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: acw011
Anybody know where this group gets its funding?

Besides welfare fraud, there's this:

"The Defense Department awarded $1.2 million in contracts to an aircraft parts supplier linked to the West Texas polygamist retreat that has been unraveled by a massive child welfare investigation, according to a newspaper report.

New Era Manufacturing, based in Nevada, where the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is primarily based, also received a $900,000 federal small-business loan in 2005, according to records found by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

John Nielsen, a former employee who worked for the company when it was known as Utah-based Western Precision in 2005, said in a 2005 affidavit as part of a civil lawsuit that church members were made to work for little or no wages.

Nielsen said in the affidavit that he and other sect members thought their work would bring them redemption, while $50,000 to $100,000 in company profits were given each month to the church "and/or" Jeffs.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported last year that JNJ Engineering, another company owned and operated by church leaders, won $11.3 million in government contract work from the Las Vegas Valley Water District. All but one of the contract workers came from Hildale and Colorado City, Ariz., where most of the sect's 10,000 members live."

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5700799.html

96 posted on 04/15/2008 11:17:30 AM PDT by Alice in Wonderland (4-hshootingsports.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil

Here’s the link to the Anderson Cooper interview with the FDLS Woman:

http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/15/inside-the-compound-and-face-to-face-with-polygamy/


97 posted on 04/15/2008 11:34:34 AM PDT by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pebcak

Saw that. I posted the same info on another thread somewhere around here!

It was quite a show, wasn’t it? Normally I don’t watch AC but happened to be flipping channels last night. Will be watching again tonight.


98 posted on 04/15/2008 12:05:47 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

Same here, bonfire. I’m not a CNN lover, but I thought he did a very good job.

Her interview coupled with the interview from the guy and his film crew in Colorado City, UT sealed the deal for me.

If a grown man with a film crew is intimidated, just think how a child must feel.

Did you catch what they were saying about the additional phone calls from the first child? I watched it twice and was not able to understand what they were saying about additional calls.


99 posted on 04/15/2008 12:16:51 PM PDT by Pebcak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Pebcak

That part was very confusing. From what I understood is they thought the girl was calling from both the Colorado AND Eldorado compounds. Then the OTHER Jessup woman who has the help line for these girls was said to be getting continual phone calls from a girl that they BELIEVE is same 16 yr. old. (as in: she’s still getting these calls)

THEN they said the calls might be coming from somewhere else where the FLDS might have “taken” her.

Is that what you heard??

Now it’s probably all just rumors and bits and pieces that the reporters are getting...so I’m not taking any of it as fact!

IF the FLDS have whisked her outta there, I doubt she has access to a cell phone anymore.

I hope they clarify some of this tonight because I was DIZZY afterwards!


100 posted on 04/15/2008 12:22:46 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson