[rb22982]

The Clinton presidency once the Republican congress came into play wasn't bad economically with very small gov't growth (far less than Bush II has) and welfare reform and no new government programs. We need that again (gridlock) which is far more likely to happen under a Clinton administration than a Obama administration for our economy to recover. If Obama isn't the nominee, blacks that vote will vote for Clinton but most will sit at home which would almost be a guarantee of a McCain win.

Plus, Obama is FAR more liberal in nearly EVERYTHING than Clinton is. THe thing his pastor has said and he has sad recently and his Muslim upbringing make me far more nervous than the devil I do know (Hillary).

[prov1813man]

The clintons are professional crooks who are actually able to implement their various schemes and could actually pull off a win in november.

Obama is an amateur whom I give no chance of winning the general. What he had the ability to do was put an end to the clintons.

We have helped thwart that very desirable outcome and are now left with at least the possibility that they could return to the whitehouse, literally “with a vengeance”.

As to the economy during Clinton one, the fact that they managed to not fall off the economic tsunami created by Reagan does not accrue to their credit.