Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZACKandPOOK
Did you discuss with Professor Meselson what he thought of those photos he was shown?

I haven't discussed anything with Professor Meselson in a long time. Most of our conversations took place in late 2002 and early 2003. If he was shown pictures of the "goop" oozing out of the spores in the TEM, he never mentioned it to me -- or to anyone, as far as I know.

Did he originate your “to err is human” theory? Does he support it? Did you discuss it?

My "to err is human" analysis of the facts is my own. Professor Meselson had nothing to do with it. I have no idea what he thinks of it. We never discussed it.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

914 posted on 06/04/2008 7:03:00 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake

You write:
“If he was shown pictures of the “goop” oozing out of the spores in the TEM, he never mentioned it to me — or to anyone, as far as I know.”

Given he was in fact shown the images, and has chosen not to ever mention it — while emphasizing that the SEMS he saw had no silica he could see, I find that interesting and would recommend that someone ask him to see if he, as an expert, shares your view. While he has not seen all of AFIP’s data, others have.


916 posted on 06/04/2008 7:47:51 AM PDT by ZACKandPOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]

To: EdLake
Most of our conversations took place in late 2002 and early 2003.

I think not - try Sunday March 7, 2004 - at 8.55AM.
918 posted on 06/04/2008 8:29:33 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson