Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake

“Journalist facing fines urges press to protect 1st Amendment,” Associated Press, May 10, 2008
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hr7kBnw1h4xjGbVWoCAtTcKc0VxwD90J162GG

“As we all know, the news business is on a collective nervous breakdown,” Toni Locy told a coalition of open-government and press groups. “It’s time to stop running. It’s time to turn and fight. If we don’t fight for the First Amendment, who will?”


608 posted on 05/10/2008 3:39:50 PM PDT by ZACKandPOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]


To: ZACKandPOOK

Film [”Secrecy”] Exposes the Seduction of Secrecy
By Jeff Stein, CQ National Security Editor
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002721511&parm1=5&cpage=4

“Mahle describes how the CIA’s Somalia analysts were deprived of intelligence in other parts of the building because they didn’t have a “need to know.” As a result, they were unable to warn U.S. troops that the rag-tag bands ransacking Mogadishu had been trained up by al Qaeda.”
***

This vivid and disturbing exposure of the human dimension of the conflict between the government’s duty to keep secrets and the peoples’ right to know deserves a national audience.
***
Nor have I met an official who would blithely disclose such a secret, just for the hell of it.

But Levin told me that government officials sometimes disclose secrets inadvertently, because “they haven’t been properly briefed or indoctrinated” on how sensitive certain kinds of information is.

***
Well, that’s the problem, isn’t it? A government of men, as it were, not laws.

Which is why, of course, we need courts, and leakers, and those who midwife their secrets into print.

“I really resent accusations that we’re not patriots or that we are indifferent to the security of the United States if we publish things that the government says are secret,” Gellman says in the film.

“I think what I do is every bit as patriotic as what a soldier does or what an intelligence officer does. I think that people who look only at security are misjudging what kind of society they’re supposed to be defending,” he says. “And I think ultimately the idea that the president and the president alone can decide what we will know is profoundly un-American.”


609 posted on 05/10/2008 6:54:22 PM PDT by ZACKandPOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson