Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TrebleRebel
Alibek: (laughing) Yeah, because there is no principle for coating.

What are you trying to prove? What do you believe these pictures show? Do you really believe the attack spores of 2001 were coated this way and NO ONE NOTICED? Or are you trying to say they were coated this way and thousands of people CONSPIRED to keep it a secret?

We KNOW that scientists have coated spores in all sorts of screwball ways since the anthrax attacks, because the screwball ways were described in the media and some idiot might actually try to use a screwball technique described in the media. So, scientists have to know what such things look like.

Out of context, all these pictures show is that it is POSSIBLE to coat spores with silica in all sorts of screwball ways.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

302 posted on 04/29/2008 8:37:13 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake

“What are you trying to prove?”

I’m not TRYING to prove anything. I’m demonstrating with FACTS that Alibek is wrong. There is, obviously, a principle to coating anthrax spores. It’s how they’ve been weaponized for decades. For Alibek to say otherwise questions everything else he has ever said about powder bioweapons.

You’ve been had.


303 posted on 04/29/2008 8:45:45 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

To: EdLake

Actually the spores in that picture were made FORTY years ago. And, yes, they are WEAPONIZED simulants. They are simulants for BIOWARFARE AGENTS. And they are COATED, COATED, COATED,

But keep pretending that is not so.


304 posted on 04/29/2008 8:47:49 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson