Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake

If the spores were hampered in germinating by the silica coatings it was a small effect. The paper only speculates that this may have increased the time a large colony took to grew - and even then only slightly.

The thrust of the paper is that EVERY sample they worked up used a silica COATING. The authors stated that the study was intended to simulate the biowarfare agent used in the 2001 attacks. Guess they know something Beecher and Meselson don’t.


295 posted on 04/29/2008 7:59:00 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: TrebleRebel
The thrust of the paper is that EVERY sample they worked up used a silica COATING. The authors stated that the study was intended to simulate the biowarfare agent used in the 2001 attacks.

Well, I'll have to read the paper before I can adequately respond to that. Can we assume that you haven't sent it to me because you don't want me to see it, you just want to tell people on this forum what you want them to believe about it?

I'm going to have to take a break for an hour or so do do some chores.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

305 posted on 04/29/2008 8:47:54 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson