Posted on 04/12/2008 2:59:21 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
B.Hussein O. is so dirty that no amount of scrubbing and spinning can get him clean. He’s a Chicago politician don’t ‘cha know?
“He is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois in Chicago...”
Professor=terrorist. You’d think that the leadership at the University of Illinois would have a little more sense than to hire this guy, but then it took Colorado a couple of years to fire Ward Churchill.
The amazing thing about all these disclosures is how cheap they are for the Clinton campaign to publicize. The free media is covering them, so she doesn’t have to expend campaign cash to spread them in political ads.
“...the Weather Underground”
I hadn’t thought of that gang for at least 30 years, maybe longer. Wow!
My father always said to keep your powder dry. He was so right.
“Obama has just finished a four-day swing through Indiana, a conservative-leaning state, which will hold its primary on May 6. Prayers and the pledge of allegiance were said. As the son of a Kenyan father and a mother from Kansas, Obama has emphasised: I owe what I can to this country, this country that I love, and I will never forget it.
Did he salute the flag? I’ve never heard why he was not saluting prior to his presidential bid; most likely some liberal conscious drivel. So now he’s showing respect? I don’t believe he cares at all about this country. He’s lived with his America hating wife and been associated with his America hating pastor for too long to be believed.
Please, Please, PLEASE read Patriot Post 08-15 (keyword Patriot Post)
This is the Democrat Party of today. The movers and shakers of this party are terrorists, Marxists, and America Haters of the first order. Their two potiential Presidental nominees reflect their goals and visions for America. If we elect either of them, we will have put a sworn enemy of the nation in the White House, and they will surround themselves with men and women who are even worse.
Although I don’t agree with everything Sean Hannity does, he does have this issue pegged.
The singular question is: how can the voting public support a man for president that admits to being friendly with a self-confessed terrorist?
Everything beyond that question is simply meaningless..IMO.
____________________________________________
Yet he ignores the far more troubling Kenya activity...one wonders why.
Ayerss early days of political protest took place at the University of Michigan, where he earned his liberal arts degree. It was there that Ayers, along with 26 others, was arrested for staging a sit-in at the Ann Arbor draft board. Ayers was influenced by SDS leaders such as Tom Hayden and Al Haber (Chepesiuk 92).
Billy Ayers offered the finest explanation of the existence of the Weather Underground. We had a grand idea that we thought was important, and we were willing to spend a very important part of our lives reaching for it. We didnt reach our goal, but I think it has made me a better person. The final chapter has yet to be written (Chepesiuk 92).
******
Remembering a Sixties Terrorist
By Donna Ron
FrontPageMagazine.com | Wednesday, January 04, 2006
I read occasionally of former Weatherman Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn, both now not only accepted, despite their bombing campaign against America in the 1960s and 70s, but successful , establishment educators whose opinions on social issues are taken seriously. Every time I see Ayers name I shudder with fear and rage and realize that I will never be able to erase the mark he left on my life one evening 40 years ago.
we heard a huge explosion. Soon after we discovered that it was a bomb that went off in the brown stone on 10th street which killed three buddies of Bill Ayers, who was now one of the leaders of the WeatherUnderground, a terrorist cult. One of the victims was Diana Oughton, his girlfriend at the time. I had known her: a kind soul who had worked at the Fresh Air Camp for troubled kids before she got mixed up with ever so persuasive Bill and the other Weatherman terrorists. When I found out she had been blown up, I thought how like him to send his girlfriend to make the bomb rather than do it himself.
Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, members of the Weathermen high command — once known as the Weatherbureau — who led the group through its most violent period in the 1970’s, have served no significant jail time. Both of them teach at name-brand universities and are headed for cozy retirements like those of the bourgeois parents they so despised during their Weathermen days. Ayers has further cushioned his future by writing a maddeningly evasive memoir, ‘’Fugitive Days’’ — one of those books that tell by not telling.
The jacket copy is the kind of agitprop that could have been written by the young Ayers himself. In it we learn that ‘’Bill Ayers was born into privilege,’’ and we are given to understand throughout ‘’Fugitive Days’’ that privilege is a crime, if not a badge of shame. How did young Billy Ayers grow into a bomber? To hear him tell it, he saw too many war movies and played with fireworks supplied by his grandfather, who taught him the ‘’proper awe and reverence’’ for an explosion that rattled the farmhouse windows.
Ayers joins S.D.S. in the 1960’s and sets up house in a Cleveland ghetto. There young radicals sing Negro spirituals and eat chitterlings with the natives, whose intelligence and industry they find surprising. Ayers has the obligatory 60’s erotic encounter with a black woman.
Ayers reminds us often that he can’t tell everything without endangering people involved in the story. But his partial retelling reaches fraudulence when he writes, ‘’Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon,’’ then backs and fills, saying that he bombed it, not literally but metaphorically, as part of the Weathermen group in charge of the operation. He says that he needed to ‘’claim’’ the explosion in order to write about it, and he adds later that he is not ashamed of any of the bombings and would not rule out planting another bomb someday; ‘’I can’t imagine entirely dismissing the possibility.’’
Where is David Horowitz on this? After what he said about Obama’s speech on Wright, we got this:
“Frontpagemag.com’
‘Posted at 12:51 PM on 3/18/2008 by David Horowitz
Obama calls black community racist. But the more likely racists are those who are defending him.
In his speech this morning, Barack Obama said that he could not disown his white-hating, Jew-hating, America-hating Pastor Jeremiah Wright because that would be the same as disowning the black community. Imagine a white politician saying he couldn’t disown David Duke because that would be disowning the white community, and you will understand how utterly Obama has unmasked himself and why he now will never be a unifying candidate that all Americans can trust. This is the end of the Obama phenomenon. It is a painfully transparent case of the racist chickens of the multicultural left coming home to roost.
Or maybe not so transparent. There are many who already are explaining Obama’s failure to repudiate his racist pastor as a matter of context. American slavery, segregation and discrimination it is argued make black racism understandable. Nonsense. These excuses are really a form of racism themselves, holding that black people cannot live up to the standards that the rest of us hold ourselves to.
There is no context that would excuse black racism. Being a slave did not make Frederick Douglass a racist; living under segregationist rule did not make Martin Luther King a racist. The Jews have been the most persecuted people on earth for 2000 years yet Jews are in the forefront of every civil rights and human rights movement of our time and one would be hard put to identify a Jewish leader who is a hater of Christians or any other group that has persecuted them. We are not as a nation going to be able to put the legacy of race behind us if we perpetuate the double standard that is at the root of racism. Either we are all equal before the moral law or we are not. Either we repudiate the racists in our midst or we do not. Jeremiah Wright is a prophet of bigotry and hate. Barack Obama is a presidential candidate who will not repudiate bigotry if it comes in a black skin. This is unacceptable. If it is not, we are in deeper trouble as a nation than we suspected. Hate breeds hate. That is a law that no context can change.”
PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE No Obamanation Part 1: Barack who?
(Part 1 of 3 on Barack Hussein Obama)
LOL. Why am I not surprised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.