Barack Obama Claims He's Not "Pro-Abortion," Abortion Not a "Good Thing"

Life News ^ | 4/11/08 | Steven Ertelt

[Hunton Peck]

You mean it’s an obamanation, don’t you? :-)

[Winged Hussar]

As LifeNews.com reported, Obama's campaign announced a new contingent of Catholics who are supporting his presidential bid. The group is led by two pro-life elected officials, Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and former Rep. Tim Roemer of Indiana.

Here is something for Catholics to consider. Please circulate widely, but don't link (as it uses my site's bandwidth)

[SumProVita]

Basically the same thing...YES! ;-)

[SumProVita]

Thanks, but as I have stated before, PRACTICING Catholics would NEVER vote for Obama...and we are CERTAINLY aware of Casey’s record. ;-0

[red irish]

That is NOT a church of God! Yesterday seen a video of a Christian man from Egypt who was trying to get some info about Obama and his church. So the man called and found out that in Obama’s church you do not have to be Christian and don’t have to be baptized and you can be Muslim because the woman he talked to said they had Muslims in their church and they don’t have to convert.

[OnRightOnLeftCoast]

A President Reagan zinger:

“I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.”

[ethics]

Casey Jr. is regarded in high regard by Bishop James Clifford Timlin of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton!

[8mmMauser]

Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm

[huldah1776]

Typical of a liberal to think that a white lie is good. They have no clue as to what is true, righteous and holy because they are totally corrupt (as are all fallen humans who are not enlightened by God). They cannot reason in whole because they cannot see the whole picture—just as a person participating in a split-brain research project can’t see or explain what was seen on one side-without the help of the whole brain. Plus, if you don’t want to see it—you won’t.

[Shade2]

This creep referred to babies as “punishment” — nobody will ever forget that is how he REALLY feels.

He referred to an unwanted, out of wedlock pregnancy as "punishment". Also, he was not referring to abortion as the means of avoiding such "punishment". He was explaining his position that sex education should include both abstinence and protection. Thus, if his daughters make moral "mistakes", hopefully they will have developed the tools to prevent this "mistake" from resulting in them being punished with an unwanted pregnancy.

[Shade2]

Go back earlier in time and you have almost described Thomas Jefferson.

[Hunton Peck]

Yup, the main differences being that 1) slavery in Jefferson's time was an evil as old as civilization itself, deeply rooted in the human soul, and was only just beginning to be seen as the horror it was, starting with some fundamentalist Christian nuts in Britain who actually took Christ's message of universal love seriously, whereas legalized abortion is a new evil which only began to be socially acceptable a few decades ago; and 2) Obama has actually acted to support, promote, and expand the culture of death, by voting to prevent children who survive botched abortion attempts from being given lifesaving treatment. Rather than Jefferson, Obama is more similar to some congresscritter who voted against the Kansas-Nebraska act because he wanted slavery to metastasize west of the Mississippi.

Jefferson was conflicted and deeply flawed. Obama is mendacious and evil.

[MrB]

When he was “explaining” that if his daughters made the mistake of “having unprotected sex” (notice that protected sex would probably be OK) at the age of 13, that they should “raise a child”.

WHAT ABOUT ADOPTION, BARRY? EVER HEARD OF IT?

[MrB]

oops, “shouldn’t” raise a child.