Posted on 04/12/2008 6:13:13 AM PDT by rhema
Are Catholics stupid enough to fall for this transparent ruse? I hope not.
More smoke and mirrors from Merlin Nobama.
Obama might mesmerize the bogus “Catholics for Choice,” but those who take the Church’s teachings seriously will recognize a poseur when they see one.
Graduate with honors of the Clinton School of Pathological Lying
He's as much a scumbag as any of the Dems.
Here's to hoping he and the Clintons destroy each other forever.
Quislings.
Their punishment will be all the greater for having known what was good and instead pursued evil.
See post 4.
Ok - this is Scrabble-face news right...?
Why does Obama not also form an “NRA” team to help him win votes from the 2nd Admendent / pro-gun voters?
Appropriate name would be Obama’s CINO Outreach. It’s going to be difficult for this group of apologists to sugar coat his extensive pro-infanticide voting record and recent assertion that a baby is a punishment.
Like a false messiah, Barry wants to be all things to all people. Without ANY core values.
Obama supports infanticide. If ‘pro-lifers’ support him, they are NOT pro-life.
Obama has voted for killing babies after birth. What kind of a human being would vote for that????
That seals it for me.I am going to vote for him now.:)Casey better change this man’s mind quick or get to confession.
“Why does Obama not also form an “NRA†team to help him win votes”
Also “evangelical Christian” team.
“Israel has a right to exist” team.
“Recovering elitist” team...
The possiblities are endless...
He can always find a few left-wing Catholics who don’t represent anybody.
And if you read his “clarification” he was saying that poor people too often vote against their own “financial interest” to cling to bad religious policy (like opposing abortion and homosexuality).
Now the bit I read was only a paraphrase of his “clarification” (thank the Chicago paper for editing it) BUT as soon as he touched on the whole concept of voting against one's financial interest in favor of religious superstitions, you google and will find the same tired arguments that keep the Democrats from even getting the black vote on social conservative issues like abortion and the norming of homosexuality.
Isn’t this the same mutt who recently equated a baby to “punishment”? This bum is such a phony!!
It’s about a woman’s right to choose whether that baby lives or not. Why it practically raped her and affixed itself inside her womb as some kind of parasite. EVEN when it is out of the womb, it still wants to be suckled and changed for YEARS on end.
ummm...the guy thinks it’s ok to let an infant survivor of abortion to be left alone to die with no medical assistance.
Not even NARAL was that extreme.
How can any pro-life catholic (and really...shouldn’t ALL catholics be pro-life? by definition?) ever seriously consider supporting the most extreme pro-deather out there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.