Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779
Well, it's always worse to surprise the market after the time allotted for the revealing of surprises. Immeldt and his staff are pros; they know—or should know—that.
14 posted on 04/11/2008 3:37:03 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: snarks_when_bored
#15 will give you an idea of what I implied. Head in sand syndrome.
16 posted on 04/11/2008 3:51:33 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored

Exactly. The big issue here is that GE has been a very reliable company, very steady-eddie on earnings announcements, very forthcoming when there have been problems.

There were two problems here today:

First, GE surprise people with this clanger of a miss. GE hasn’t done this — ie, surprised people with this kind of miss — without giving analysts and investors a heads-up during the quarter.

Second big problem was GE saying that the ‘landscape’ had changed after the Bear Stearns problems. So, what are they saying? That they own highly speculative paper too? What bearing would Bear’s collapse have on GE’s assets? That’s what has me wondering what is on GE’s books.


29 posted on 04/11/2008 4:34:39 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson